Laserfiche WebLink
b. Concl�sions: The granting of the variance would permit the <br /> subject property the sa;r�e rigtits enjoyed by othAr properties <br /> in the area. <br /> Criterian No. 4: <br /> That the variance is the minimum necessary io aliow the subject property <br /> the gene;ol rights descrihed in Criterion 3. <br /> a. Findinqs: See Criteria #3. <br /> b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 <br /> Criterion No. 5: <br /> The grantir.g of ihe variance is consistent with the goals and policies of <br /> the Everett General Plan. <br /> a. Findinr�s: The Everett General Pian designales this property <br /> as 4.4 Mixed Use Commercial. <br /> b. Conclusions: The proposed signage foi the commercial use <br /> of the subject property is consistent with the Everelt General <br /> Plan. <br /> Criteriaa No. 6: <br /> The need for the requested variance ic not the result of a self-created <br /> hardship. <br /> a. Findinqs: The app:tcan4 has stated that the conditions which <br /> necessitate this variance request are all pre-existing and not <br /> the result of a self-created hardship. The structure is located <br /> up to the wc m property line and the utilities are located on <br /> the northK�e , of the building. The large portion of <br /> unimproved . : of way adjacent.to the site presents a <br /> unique feature not common to many of the other commercial <br /> siles located along Evergreen V�/ay. <br /> b. Conclusions: There are unique circumstances regarding the <br /> location of existing improvements on the property, including <br /> the building locatio�i and large right-of-way that all lend ta the <br /> need for the requested variance, and therefore the requested <br /> variance is not the result of a self-created hardship. <br /> _ � <br />