6503 EVERGREEN WAY SPORTYS BEEF AND BREW 2018-01-02 MF Import

�� � i0 p C M 7 H N r � � � o m o b M M N M � z � q � °x n o H CC Q c� • nq 5 H 3 � y z H H °n o N �r5r zyv�i H O N i i �e oa' �� Gregg Ortega Appeal 8-92 Page -2- L. Itemized List by Greg Ortega Showing Proposed 1992 Addition Costs M. EMC 1?.68 N. Appraisal Dafed May 2, 1988 by Harvey White Subsequent to the hearing the following exhibits v+ere submitted and admitted as part of the o�cial record of this proceeding: O. Closing Escrow Statement dated November 30, 1989. Submitted by the Appellant P. Memo to James Driscoll dated November 24, 1992, from Craig Fullerton, Public Works Department After due consideration of the testimony and evidence presenied by the Appellant, testimony and evidence elicited during the public hearing; and as the result of the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding areas by the Everett Hearing Examiner, the following findings of fact and conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACTS � j 1. The Appellant is the lessee of Sporty's Beef and Brew, a restaurant and tavern � 19cated at 6503 Evergreen Way, Everett, Washington. The prope� �y was purchased in November, 1989, by its current owner. Prior to the purchase, the property was developed and used as a piva parlor. r � 2. On October 31, 1989, the Appellant obtained a building permit from the City of Everett for the remodel of the building on-site. At the time of that remodel application, the Appellant indicated to the City that the amount of work to be done on-site would be $25,000. The City determined that this stated amount was less than 50°/a of the fair market value of the property and thus did not require street or alley improvements at the owner's expense. The City relied on the 1987 Snohomish County Tax Assessments of the subject property. The Everett Municipal Code (EMC) 13.68.020 allows the City to require improvements to public streets and alleys if additions, alterations, or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed 50% of the current market value of the existing property. 3. The total cost of repairs made by the Appellant during the 1989 remodol was $73,423. The City submittad that because of the costs of 1he extensive remodel, as compared to the subject property's value, street improvements should have been required as part of the 1989 building permit.