My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
120 SE EVERETT MALL WAY Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
>
120
>
Geotech Report
>
120 SE EVERETT MALL WAY Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:09:55 PM
Creation date
2/4/2020 10:28:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
120
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Crow-Western E-270d <br />August 14, 1985 Page 4 <br />to reduce the potential Eor excessive differential settlemenCs the <br />proposed buildiny loads should either be carried down through the <br />fills to coiapetent native soils or alternatively, the buildings <br />shculd be founded on structural fill placed over competent soils. <br />'1'he on-site soils will be difficult to work during and <br />following periods oE sustained precipitation due to tlie high <br />amount of fi�es present. Ideally, grading activities sliould be <br />timed to take place during the dry summer months. Grad::ny <br />activities during the wetter Eal.l, winter and spring months will <br />he subject to delays due to heavy rains. Extra costs for imported <br />clean pit run Eor use as structural fill and the potential for <br />soEtening of previously prapared surEaces due to construction <br />trafEic could be expected durin� construction in wet conditions. <br />The nearly flat site together. with the probable high winter <br />"perched" water tahle will require the establishment of a drainaga <br />system to direct surEace anci near surface water away from <br />construction and/or building areas, <br />The Eollowing sections contain our recoimnendations in greater <br />detail. <br />(�� u <br />Poundations l�% <br />The proposed sl•ructure may be sup�ortad on conventional conti- <br />nuous and spread footings bearing on the undisturbed native till <br />soils or on structural fi11 placed above competent native soils. <br />Fill placed under. Eootings should extend outwards from the edge of <br />the footings at least a dislance equal to the depth of the fill <br />beneath the footings. F'.xterior� footinys should be boltomed at a <br />minimum deptt�� of � welve (12).'inches below the lowest adjacent <br />outside Eini,h yrade. I-nt�rior footinys may be at a depth of <br />twelve (12) inches nelow the top of the slab. Footings founded on <br />competent native till soils and/or on structural Eill may also be <br />designed for a bearing pressure oE two thousand five hundred <br />(2500) pounds per square foot (psf). Continuous and individual <br />spread Eootings si;ould have minimum widths of twelve (12) and <br />eighteen (18) inches, respectively. A one-tt�ir�i increase in the <br />above bearing pressu:es may t�e used when considering shor.t term <br />wind or seismic loads. <br />For the ahove design criteria, it is anticipated that total <br />settlements oE footings f.ounded on native till soils an�9 on fills <br />less than five feet thick will he about three-quarters inch, with <br />diEEerential settlements of one-half inch. Almost all settlements <br />sliould occur during construction. IE any continuous Eootings are <br />located partially in cut and partially in fill, we recommend that <br />the structural engineer consider a�9ding additional teinforcement <br />in the footinqs and fo�tiny walls near the cut-fill transition <br />Earih Consultants, Inc <br />f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.