My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/05/28 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/05/28 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:18:14 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 10:51:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/28/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evidence -Based Programs or Practices <br />OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policy making and program <br />development in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. OJP is committed to: <br />• improving the quantity and quality of evidence OJP generates; <br />• integrating evidence into program, practice, and policy decisions within OJP and the <br />field; and <br />• improving the translation of evidence into practice. <br />OJP considers programs and practices to be evidence -based when their effectiveness has been <br />demonstrated by causal evidence, generally obtained through one or more outcome <br />evaluations. Causal evidence documents a relationship between an activity or intervention <br />(including technology) and its intended outcome, including measuring the direction and size of a <br />change, and the extent to which a change may be attributed to the activity or <br />intervention. Causal evidence depends on the use of scientific methods to rule out, to the extent <br />possible, alternative explanations for the documented change. The strength of causal evidence, <br />based on the factors described above, will influence the degree to which OJP considers a <br />program or practice to be evidence -based. <br />OJP's CrimeSolutions.qov web site is one resource that applicants may use to find information <br />about evidence -based programs in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. <br />Additionally, when considering evidence -based programs and practices specific to reentry, it is <br />recommended that jurisdictions review the What Works in Reentry Clearinghouse for important <br />research on the effectiveness of a wide variety of reentry programs and practices. The <br />Clearinghouse provides a one -stop shop for practitioners and service providers seeking <br />guidance on evidence -based reentry interventions. <br />Amount and Length of Awards <br />Eligible allocations under JAG are posted annually on BJA's JAG web page: <br />www.bia.gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?Program ID=59. <br />Awards of at least $25,000 or more are 4 years in length with an award period of October 1, <br />2013 through September 30, 2017. Extensions beyond a 4-year period may be made on a case - <br />by -case basis at the discretion of BJA and must be requested via the Grants Management <br />System (GMS) no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date. <br />Awards that are less than $25,000 are 2 years in length with an award period of October 1, <br />2013 through September 30, 2015. Requests for up to an additional 2 years to complete <br />performance of the award will be granted automatically, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3751(f). <br />Extensions beyond a 4-year period may be made on a. case -by -case basis at the discretion of <br />BJA and must be requested via the Grants Management System (GMS) no less than 30 days <br />prior to the grant end date. <br />All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or <br />additional requirements that may be imposed by law. <br />99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.