My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/05/28 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/05/28 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:18:14 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 10:51:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/28/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Budget Information <br />AG awards are based on a statutory formula as described below. <br />Although JAG grantees and subgrantees are required to report on quarterly <br />accountability measures through BJA's Performance Measurement Tool (PMT), those <br />reports are intended to promote greater transparency about the use of JAG funds and do <br />not determine the amount of JAG funds allocated to a state and/or localities. <br />Applicants must submit a budget and budget narrative outlining how JAG funds, including <br />administrative funds if applicable, will be used to support and implement the program. See the <br />budget narrative description under the "How to Apply" section (page 20) for more <br />information. <br />JAG Formula: Once each fiscal year's overall JAG Program funding level is determined, BJA <br />partners with the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to begin a four -step grant award calculation <br />process which consists of: <br />1. Computing an initial JAG allocation for each state and territory, based on their share of <br />violent crime and population (weighted equally). <br />2. Reviewing the initial JAG allocation amount to determine if the state or territory allocation <br />is less than the minimum ("de minimus") award amount defined in the JAG legislation <br />(0.25 percent of the total). If this is the case, the state or territory is funded at the <br />minimum level, and the funds required for this are deducted from the overall pool of JAG <br />funds. Each of the remaining states receives the minimum award plus an additional <br />amount based on their share of violent crime and population. <br />3. Dividing each state's final award amount (except for the territories and District of <br />Columbia) between state and local governments at a rate of 60 and 40 percent, <br />respectively. <br />4. Determining local unit of government award allocations, which are based on their <br />proportion of the state's 3-year violent crime average. If a local eligible award amount is <br />Tess than $10,000, the funds are returned to the state to be awarded to these local units <br />of government through the state agency. If the eligible award amount is $10,000 or <br />more, then the local government is eligible to apply for a JAG award directly from BJA. <br />Administrative Funds: A unit of local government may use up to 10 percent of the award, <br />including interest, for costs associated with administering JAG funds. <br />Supplanting: Supplanting is prohibited under JAG. Applicants cannot replace or supplant non- <br />federal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. See the JAG FAQs on BJA's <br />JAG web page for examples of supplanting. <br />Leveraging of Grant Funds: Although supplanting is prohibited, the leveraging of federal <br />funding is encouraged. For example, a city may utilize JAG and Homeland Security Grant <br />Program (HSGP) money to fund different portions of a fusion center project. In instances where <br />leveraging occurs, all federal grant funds must be tracked and reported on separately and may <br />not be used to fund the same line items. Additionally, federal funds cannot be used as match for <br />other federal awards. <br />7 <br />100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.