Laserfiche WebLink
years, and the interest nationally and regionally in more efficient vehicle technology, we feel that 20% is a <br />conservative assumption for the region's 2040 fleet. <br />• Aggressive Scenario: 45% <br />This scenario is comprised of a more aggressive assumption that by 2040, should the region, the state and <br />the federal government more actively pursue the transition to alternative vehicles, 45% of the Puget Sound <br />fleet could be electric, plug-in hybrid electric or other zero to low emission vehicles. Many of the studies and <br />analyses researched indicate the possibility of a greater penetration into the national fleet of alternative <br />vehicles than our conservative scenario. The conservative, or likely, scenario is based on the current <br />conditions in our region and the expected growth in the market. Given all the other factors mentioned — the <br />impetus in Washington State and the Puget Sound region, the expected full fleet turnover by 2040, and the <br />expected national agenda on clean technology — a more aggressive fleet penetration of 45% seems <br />reasonable should a more focused pursuit of this transition occur at all levels. <br />1 B. Improvements to Vehicle Fuel Economy <br />The second supposition regarding the potential for improvements to the vehicle fleet in the Puget Sound region is <br />what additional improvements in fuel economy might be possible by 2040. Research conducted on this topic <br />included studies and analyses conducted by the following agencies or institutions (a full bibliography of sources is <br />included at the end of this white paper): <br />■ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) <br />• Cambridge Systematics <br />• U.S. EPA <br />• California Air Resources Board <br />• Energy Information Administration (EIA) <br />■ Congressional Budget Office <br />■ U.S. Department of Energy <br />In September 2009, NHTSA and EPA released a joint proposed rule to update the current Corporate Average <br />Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for the light -duty passenger vehicle fleet. Previously, the CAFE standards were <br />27.5 miles per gallon (mpg) for passenger vehicles and 20.7 mpg for light trucks; the light truck standards were <br />updated in 2006 to 23.5 mpg by model year 2010. In March 2009, as a precursor to the subsequent rulemaking, <br />NHTSA set a new standard for model year 2011 vehicles of 30.2 mpg for passenger cars and 24.1 mpg for light <br />trucks, for a combined fleet average of 27.5 mpg. The new CAFE standards once finalized will apply to both <br />passenger cars and light trucks manufactured in model years 2012 through 2016; the joint rulemaking with EPA's <br />proposed greenhouse gas emissions standards for light duty vehicles will achieve a combined average of 35.5 <br />mpg by model year 2016. <br />Given the movement nationally to improve the fuel economy of the future vehicle fleet, activity in California related <br />to fuel economy improvements, as well as legislation in Washington State related to clean vehicles and alternative <br />fuels, we categorized the potential for future fuel economy improvements to the Puget Sound vehicle fleet by <br />2040 into the following two scenarios: <br />• Likely Scenario: 40 mpg <br />This scenario is comprised of a fairly conservative assumption that by 2040, further strengthening of the <br />CAFE standards for the passenger vehicle fleet is likely. This scenario assumes that the average fuel <br />economy of the Puget Sound passenger vehicle fleet in 2040 will be 40 mpg, compared to the proposed new <br />standards which would achieve a fleet average nationally of 35.5 mpg by model year 2016. <br />• Aggressive Scenario: 50 mpg <br />This scenario is comprised of a more aggressive assumption that by 2040, there is the potential that even <br />greater improvements to vehicle fuel economy can be achieved. This scenario assumes a continued interest <br />at the national level in pursuing cleaner and more efficient vehicles, from a 34.1 mpg national fleet average in <br />2016 to a 50 mpg fleet average in the Puget Sound region by 2040. <br />It is important to note here that the categories of technology improvements outlined in this report are not mutually <br />exclusive. For example, one way to improve the average fuel economy of the fleet is to include electric vehicles <br />L-4 <br />Appendix L: Climate Change Background <br />