Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and <br /> Krebs Property Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations <br /> II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS <br /> The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and <br /> shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. <br /> 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATION <br /> Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. The vast majority of these <br /> events are small and are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as <br /> evidenced by the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event; the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; and the 1965, <br /> 6.5-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region <br /> during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake <br /> return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within <br /> a given 20-year period. <br /> Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic <br /> events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and <br /> 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed <br /> project is discussed below. <br /> 5.1 Surficial Ground Rupture <br /> The nearest known fault trace to the project site is the South Whidbey Island Fault, located <br /> within approximately 6 miles to the southwest. No surficial faulting or earth rupture <br /> associated with the South Whidbey Island Fault has been documented to date in the Snohomish <br /> County region. <br /> 5.2 Seismically Induced Landslides <br /> The risk of damage to the proposed project by seismically induced landsliding is low due to the <br /> lack of steep slopes in the project area. No mitigation of landslide hazards is warranted. <br /> 5.3 Liquefaction <br /> The encountered stratigraphy has a low potential for liquefaction due to its dense state and lack <br /> of adverse ground water conditions. No mitigation of liquefaction hazards is warranted. <br /> February 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES,INC. <br /> TJP/id-KE070023A1-Prof ects120070023IKEIWP Page 5 <br />