Laserfiche WebLink
08/18/2085 15:27 4257478561 GEOTECH P� db <br /> Lucia Deve/opment, LLC JN 05233 <br /> August 18,2005 Page 5 <br /> SEISMIC CONSlDERATfONS <br /> 7he sRe is loeated wRhin Seismic Zone 3, as illustreted on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniforrn <br /> Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Ta61e 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within <br /> 100 feet ot the ground su�face is best represented by Soil Profile Type So (Stiff Soil). Under the <br /> 2003 Intemational Building Code (IBC) the Soii Class would be D. Tha dense to very dense native <br /> soils that will support the proposed piling are not suseeptfble to seismic liquefaction due to their <br /> dense consistency. <br /> WPE P1tES <br /> 7hree- or 4inch-diameter pipe piles driven with a 650- or 800- or 1,100-pound hyd►'aulic <br /> jackhammer ta the following final penetration rates may be assigned the following compressive <br /> capacities. <br /> 3 inches 12 s�nch 10�nch 6 seeFrch 6 tons <br /> 4 inehes 20 seGinch 15 s�neh 10 sedinch 10 tons <br /> Note: The refusal criteria indicated in the above table ate valid only for pipe piles that are <br /> installed usir�g a hydraulic impact hammer carcied on leads that allow the hammer to sit on <br /> the top of the pile during driving. If the piles are installed by aRemative methods, such as a <br /> vihrdtory hammer or a hammer that is hard-mourrted to the instaliation machine, numerous <br /> load tests to 2�0 percerrt of the design capacity would be necessary to substantiate the <br /> allowable pile load. The ap�xopriate number of load tests would need to be determined at <br /> the time the contrecto�and installation method are chosen. As a minimum, load tests on 20 <br /> percent af the piks is typical where altemative pfle installation methods aze used. <br /> Due to the presence of organic material in the fill soils, we recommend that cortosion protedion, <br /> such� gaNanizing, 6e provfded fot the pipe piles. If obstnictio�s are enCountered during pipe pile <br /> installation, the obstr�dions should be removed with an excavator, or the piles should be relocated <br /> to miss the obstfuCtions. <br /> Pile caps and gl'ade beams should be used to transmit loads to the piles. Isolated pite Caps should <br /> inGude a minimum of two piles to reduce the potential for eccentrie loads heing applied to the piles. <br /> Subsequent sections of pipe ean be conneeted with slip or threaded couplers, o� they can be <br /> welded together. If slip wuplers are used, they should fit snugly into the pipe sections. Tftis may <br /> require that shims be used or that beads of welding flux be applied to the outside of the coupler. <br /> Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by passive earth pressure acting on the <br /> veRical, embedded portions of the foundation. For this condition, the foundatian must be eNher <br /> poured direetly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surro�nded by level structural fill. We <br /> recommend using a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pe� for this resistance. If <br /> the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above Will <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC, I� <br />