My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11611 AIRPORT RD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
AIRPORT RD
>
11611
>
Geotech Report
>
11611 AIRPORT RD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:26:17 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 1:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
AIRPORT RD
Street Number
11611
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> t ^. <br /> Geo[echnical Engmcering Rcport <br /> Proposcd Ahn W�rehouse <br /> May I l, 2001 <br /> CG File No. 1 l21 <br /> Page I I <br /> Retaining Wall Design Values <br /> The lateral earth pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the <br /> soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement, which can occur as backfill is placed, <br /> and the inclination of the backfill. Walls that are free to yield at least one-thousandth of the <br /> height of the wall are in an "active" coudition. Walls restrained from movement by stiffness or <br /> bracing are in an "at-resP' condition. Active earth pressure and at-rest eaRh pressure can be <br /> calculared based on equivalent fluid density. Equivalent fluid densi[ies for acti:•e and at-rest earth <br /> pressure of 35 pounds' per cubic fooi (pcQ and 55 pcf,respectively, may be usrd for design for a <br /> level backslope. These values assume tha[ the on-site soils or imported granular fill are used for <br /> backfill, and that Ihe wall backfill is drained. The preceding values do not include the effects of <br /> surcharges, such as due to foundation loads, traffic or other surface loads'. Surc}�arge effects <br /> should be considered where appropriate. <br /> The 3bove lateral preseures may be resisted by fiiction at the base of the wall and passive <br /> resistance against the foundation. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be used to determine the <br /> base friction in Ihe native blacial soils. An equivalant fluid density 300 pcf should be used for <br /> passive resistance design. To achieve this value of passive pressure, the foundations should be <br /> poured "neaY' against the native dense soils, or compacted fill should be used as backfill against <br /> the front of the footing, and the soil in front of the wall should extend a horizontal distance at <br /> least equal to three times the foundation depth. We recommend that the upper 1 foot of soil be <br /> neglected when determining the passive resistance unless covered with a slab-on-grade. <br /> All wall backtill should be well compacted. Care should be taken to przvent the buildup of <br /> excess lateral soil pressures due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. This can be <br /> accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch loose lifts and compacting with small, hand- <br /> operated compactors. <br /> Permanent drainage systems should be installed for retaining walls. We recommend that these <br /> drainage systems consist of an l8-inch-wide zone of cleen (less than 3 percent fines), free- <br /> draining granular material placed along the back of the wall. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain <br /> material. The granul�r matenal should bc placed up the back of the wall to within 1 foot of the <br /> ground surfacc. Drrmage composite may he used in place of the 18-inch wide zone of free- <br /> Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. �/ ��' <br /> �� I ,i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.