My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11802 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
11802
>
BASE FILE
>
Geotech Report
>
11802 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:27:05 PM
Creation date
6/2/2020 9:08:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
11802
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
neild/[bbb 15:27 q257q78561 GEDTECH <br /> � ' � PAGE 09 <br /> Lucla Development LLC <br /> August 18, 2005 JN 05233 <br /> Page 8 <br /> as determined 6y ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this spedficaUon, <br /> aithough the manufacturers oi the admixt�ares should Ce consuRed. Where plastic sheeting is used <br /> under slabs, joints should overfap by at least 6 lnches and be sealed with adhesive tape. Tha <br /> sheeting should extend to ihe foundation walls for m�cimum vapor protection. If no pofenttai for <br /> vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor b�vrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as <br /> . defined by ACI, is a product wiU1 a water transmisslon r�te of 0.00 pertns per square foot per hour <br /> when tested (n accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overiaps can <br /> meet thfs requirement. <br /> In the I�cent past, ACI (Section 4.1.b) recornmended that a mfnimum of 4 inches of well-graded <br /> �mpactable granular materfal, such as a 5/8 tnch minus crushed rock pavemant bese, should be <br /> placed over U1e vapor retarcler or batrier for protection of!he retafder or barrier and es a �lofter"to <br /> aid in the curing of the concrete slab. 5and was not recommended by AC! for this purpose. <br /> Ho„vvever, the use of maierial over the vapor ret2rder is controversial as noted in ame;�t ACI <br /> literature because of the potential that the protectioNb(otter material can become wet belwee� the <br /> time of fts placement and the installation of the stab. If the material is wet prior to slab placemerrt, <br /> which !s always possible in the Pupet Sound area, it could cause vapor transmisslon to occur up <br /> through the slab in the future, esserttiaily destroyin8 the purpose of the vapor bartier/retarder. <br /> Therefore, ff therP is a patential that the protectioNblotter material will become wet before the s�ab <br /> is (nstalled, AC! r.ow recommends that no p�ctection/blotter material be used. However, ACI then <br /> recommends tha.t, bequse there is a poiential for slab cure due to the loss of the Diotter materiai, <br /> l�im spadng in the slab be reduced, a �oW shrinka8e concrete mixture be used, and "other <br /> m^as;!res" (steel reinforcing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-98 "Standard Practice for Installation of <br /> Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contad with Earth or Gfanular FII Under Concrete Slabs" <br /> 9en�rally agrees rivith the recent ACI literature. <br /> VVe recommend that tfie cot�tractor� the project materials eng(neer, and the owner discuss these <br /> issues and reWew recent ACI literature and ASTM E-1643 for Installation guidelines and guidance <br /> on ti�e use of the protectioNblotter material. Ou� opinfon is that with impervious surtaces that aA <br /> means should be undertaken to reduce w8ter vapor ttansmiss3on. <br /> DCCAVA770NS AND SLOPES <br /> No excavated slopes ere antidpated other than for utility tre�ches. Excavation slopes should not <br /> exceed the limits specified in tocal, state, and national govemment safety regulations. Temporary <br /> cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attemptad vertically in unsaturated so(I, if there ere no <br /> indications of slope instabiliry. Hawever, vertical cuts should not be made near property <br /> boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Sased upon Washington Administrative Code <br /> (WAC) 2gF, pan N, the soil at the subjed site would generaliy be dassffied as Type C. Thenefore, <br /> temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height should not be excavatad at an inclination steeper <br /> than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the t�ottom of a cut. <br /> The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on the conditions exposed in our <br /> explorations, and on whai has been successful at other sites with slmflar sofl condRions. It i" <br /> possible that variations in so(I and groundwater candiqons Will requfre modificatians to the <br /> fnclination at whi�h temporary slopes can stand. Temporary cuts are those that will remain <br /> unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the constnidlon of foundations, retaining <br /> walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protecfed Wj� p�astic sheeting during wet <br /> weather. It is also important that surtace water be directed away from temporary slope cuts, The <br /> cut slopes should also k� backfilled or retafned as soon as possible to reduce the potential for <br /> GEOTECN CONSULTANTS,INC. � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.