Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> � SuLsurface Ezpforatian, Geologic Hazard, and <br /> Preliminary Crtoteduucal Engu�en^g Report <br /> Sno-lsle Skil(s Center Addition Pre(imina Desi Recommendat�ons <br /> EvereK, W¢thin ton <br /> � III. PRELIMINARY DFSIGN RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> I 8A INTRODUCTION <br /> I It is our opinion chat from a geotechnical stagdpoint the site is suitable for the proposed <br /> improvements provided that the recommendations contained herein aze properly followed. <br /> htedium dense ro very dense lodgement till was encountered at relatively shatlo^� depths in our <br /> explorations on the site, and conventional spread footings may bc used for support of the <br /> proposed new buildings. Some overexcavation and replacement of fill soils should�or aceess <br /> if it is encountered below building foundations, floor slab azeas, or new parking <br /> :ueas. Standazd pavement sections should perform well within the proposed new pazking and <br /> bus loading azeas with proper subgrade prepazation. The existing fill and lodgement till suils <br /> contain substantial quantities of silt, and during the wet winter and spring months, the <br /> contractor and school district should be prepazed to manage over-optimum moisture content <br /> (wet) soil and subgrade conditions. Construction should be timed to take advantage of dry <br /> weather, if possible. <br /> 9.0 SITE PREPARATION <br /> Site prepazation of azeas to be graded should �c�i�ei de e er ous m ter al�Addirionally <br /> demolition debris from existing strucmres, and any roo� �bbed Bas�d o� our <br /> the upper organic topsoil should be removed and the remaining g <br /> explorations, the majority of the topsoil 6ad been stripped as pazt of original grading activities. <br /> If topsoil is present, it is expected chat it wiil be between 6 and 12 inches thick. <br /> Areas where loose soils exist due to previous grading, filling, or grubbing operations should be <br /> considered as uncontrolled fill to the depth of disturbance and treated as subsequently <br /> recommended for sWctural fill p.'acement. Where existing, loose fill or natural sediments aze <br /> relatively free of organics and near their optimwn moisture content for compaction, they can <br /> be segregated for reuse as sWctural fill. Since the density of the soil is variahle, random sofr <br /> pockets may exist, and the depth and extent of stripping can best be determined in the field by <br /> the geotechnicai engineer or engineering geologist. <br /> q ] permanent Cut and Fill Slopes <br /> Permanent cut and structural fill slopes that are not intended to be expo� i to stancling water <br /> should be graded no steeper than 2H:1V (Horizontal:Verticalj. P:cmanent cu[ and structaral <br /> fiil siopes that will be exposed to standing water should be inclined at 3H:IV or flatter. Slopes <br /> should be hydroseeded, landscaped, or otherwise protected as soon as possible aRer grading. <br /> Cut slopes in natural soils that must be steeper ihan 2A:1V should be protected by a rcekery or <br /> ASSOCIATED EdRTH SC/E��S,INC. <br /> �w1e��, Zppg Page 10 <br /> Fr,�m-�o5oiri,+s-r,qrm�musatt3�wP <br />