Laserfiche WebLink
Il <br /> I <br /> 2 5-04.3(10)D2 HMA Compaction Nonstatistical Evaluation—Acceptance Testing <br /> 3 The location of the HMA compaction acceptance tests will be randomly selected by the <br /> I <br /> 4 Engineer from within each sublot, with one test per sublot. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 5-O4.3(10)D3 HMA Nonstatistical Compaction— Price Adjustments <br /> I 7 For each compaction lot with one or two sublots, having all sublots attain a relative density <br /> 8 that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density the HMA shall be accepted at the unit <br /> 9 Contract price with no further evaluation. When a sublot does not attain a relative density <br /> I <br /> 10 that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density, the lot shall be evaluated in <br /> 11 accordance with Section 1-06.2 to determine the appropriate CPF. The maximum CPF shall <br /> 12 be 1.00, however, lots with a calculated CPF in excess of 1.00 will be used to offset lots with <br /> I13 14 CPF values below 1.00 but greater than 0.90. Lots with CPF lower than 0.90 will be <br /> evaluated for compliance per 5-04.3(11). Additional testing by either a nuclear moisture- <br /> 15 density gauge or cores will be completed as required to provide a minimum of three tests for <br /> I <br /> 16 evaluation. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 For compaction below the required 91% a Non-Conforming Compaction Factor(NCCF) will <br /> I 19 be determined. The NCCF equals the algebraic difference of CPF minus 1.00 multiplied by <br /> 20 40 percent. The Compaction Price Adjustment will be calculated as the product of CPF, the <br /> 21 quantity of HMA in the compaction control lot in tons, and the unit Contract price per ton of <br /> I <br /> 22 mix. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 5-04.3(11) Reject Work <br /> I25 <br /> 26 5-04.3(11)A Reject Work General <br /> 27 Work that is defective or does not conform to Contract requirements shall be rejected. The <br /> I28 Contractor may propose, in writing, alternatives to removal and replacement of rejected <br /> 29 material. Acceptability of such alternative proposals will be determined at the sole discretion <br /> 30 of the Engineer. HMA that has been rejected is subject to the requirements in Section 1- <br /> ' 31 06.2(2) and this specification, and the Contractor shall submit a corrective action proposal to <br /> 32 the Engineer for approval. <br /> 33 <br /> 1 <br /> 34 5-04.3(11)B Rejection by Contractor <br /> 35 The Contractor may, prior to sampling, elect to remove any defective material and replace it <br /> I 36 with new material. Any such new material will be sampled, tested, and evaluated for <br /> 37 acceptance. <br /> 38 <br /> I 39 5-04.3(11)C Rejection Without Testing (Mixture or Compaction) <br /> 40 The Engineer may, without sampling, reject any batch, load, or section of Roadway that <br /> 41 appears defective. Material rejected before placement shall not be incorporated into the <br /> I 42 pavement. Any rejected section of Roadway shall be removed. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 No payment will be made for the rejected materials or the removal of the materials unless <br /> I <br /> 45 the Contractor requests that the rejected material be tested. If the Contractor elects to have <br /> 46 the rejected material tested, a minimum of three representative samples will be obtained <br /> 47 and tested. Acceptance of rejected material will be based on conformance with the <br /> I <br /> 48 nonstatistical acceptance Specification. If the CPF for the rejected material is less than 0.75, <br /> 49 no payment will be made for the rejected material; in addition, the cost of sampling and <br /> I 2020 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE OVERLAY PAGE 59 OF 79 SPECIAL PROVISIONS <br /> WORK ORDER 3727 FEBRUARY 20,2020 <br />