Laserfiche WebLink
November 11, 2016 <br /> HWA Project No. 2014-117-21 <br /> also recommend that the face of the signal pole closest to the slope be located at least 1 shaft <br /> diameter away from the top of the slope. <br /> 4.7 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT <br /> The increased stormwater associated with the proposed project will necessitate upgraded <br /> stormwater management facilities. The entire alignment is predominantly underlain by glacial <br /> till soil,present at shallow depths. Glacial till soils possess high fines contents and are generally <br /> not conducive to onsite infiltration. Consequently, the use on onsite infiltration as a means of <br /> stormwater management is not feasible for this project. We understand that an underground <br /> stormwater detention vault is proposed as means of stormwater management for this project from <br /> which the stormwater will be conveyed off site. <br /> We understand the underground detention vault will consist of a cast-in-place concrete system. <br /> Inlet pipes will be used to convey stormwater into stormwater conveyance systems and into the <br /> detention vault. Outlet pipes will be used to convey the stored stormwater from the detention <br /> vault to appropriate discharge locations <br /> Based on the available soil information, we expect that the detention vault will be founded on <br /> very dense glacial till soil. An allowable bearing pressure of 5,000 psf should be assumed for <br /> design. We assume that the vault will be backfilled with compacted gravel borrow backfill <br /> possessing a unit weight of approximately 135 pcf. We assume that the vault will not be free to <br /> deform under static loading conditions (at rest earth pressures assumed for static loading)but will <br /> be free to deflect sufficiently to develop active loading conditions during the design earthquake. <br /> Based on these assumptions, the lateral earth pressures provided in Figure 5 should be used for <br /> design of the vault structure. Figure 5 provides the anticipated pressures associated with traffic <br /> loading(250 psf at ground surface), soil over the vault, earth pressure and hydrostatic pressure. <br /> No ground water seepage was encountered during our explorations in the vicinity of the vault <br /> (BH-2 and BH-3),which were drilled during a dry summer period. However,we expect that the <br /> vault excavation backfill will fill with water over time due to the very low permeability of the <br /> glacial till soils (bath tub affect). Therefore, the vault should be designed to resist buoyancy <br /> forces. For our earth pressure diagrams, we assumed the worst case scenario, where groundwater <br /> accumulates up to the proposed ground surface. However, it may be that water will drain out of <br /> the fill before this extreme case occurs. For buoyancy calculations, we recommend the <br /> groundwater level be assumed at the highest level it can raise before flowing out through the <br /> surface or through more permeable trench backfill extending from the vault excavation. <br /> 2014-117 Final Geotechnical Report 12 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. <br />