My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7000 HARDESON RD 2020-06-05
>
Address Records
>
HARDESON RD
>
7000
>
7000 HARDESON RD 2020-06-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2020 1:58:07 PM
Creation date
6/5/2020 1:50:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARDESON RD
Street Number
7000
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Community Transit Merrill Creek Operating Base <br /> 7100 Hardeson Road <br /> Everett, Washington <br /> February 28, 2018 <br /> RN File No. 3224-002A <br /> Page 3 <br /> summed. These numbers are then converted to a hammer energy transfer standard which is <br /> 60 percent, N60. If the number of blows reached 50 before the sampler was driven through any <br /> 6-inch interval, the sampler was not driven further and the blow count is recorded as 50 for the <br /> actual penetration distance. <br /> The borings were located in the field by an engineer from this firm who also examined the soils <br /> and geologic conditions encountered, and maintained logs of the borings. The approximate <br /> locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were visually classified <br /> in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented <br /> as Figure 3. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures 4 through 21. <br /> We explored the possibility of either a clogged drain system or a beak in a water line <br /> contributing to the surface water. The drain system was flushed out so a video camera could <br /> inspect the lines to determine if any breaks were visible. However, the camera was unable to <br /> clearly 'see' through the water in the drain line. CT then closed the valve on the water line and <br /> observed the meter to determine if there was a break in that system. The water meter did not <br /> move during the shut off period, indicating no break in the line. <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> A brief description of the conditions encountered in our explorations is included below. For a <br /> more detailed description of the soils encountered, review the Boring Logs in Figures 4 through <br /> 21. <br /> Our explorations generally encountered a surficial layer of fill ranging in thickness from <br /> approximately 10 to 29 feet. The fill varied in composition and density from loose to very dense <br /> silty sand with gravel and sand with silt and gravel to stiff silt with sand and wood. Traces of <br /> clay and wood debris were noted within the fill in Borings 6 through 12. The fill extended to the <br /> depths of the explorations in the shallow Borings 1 through 5 and to depths ranging from 14 to <br /> 29 feet in the remaining borings. Below the fill we generally encountered medium dense to <br /> very dense fine to coarse sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel interpreted as Advance <br /> Outwash. In these explorations this material extended to the depth explored. <br /> Laboratory Testing <br /> We completed grain size and moisture content testing on selected samples from our <br /> explorations. The moisture contents are shown on the boring logs. The grain size results are <br /> presented as Figures 23 and 24. <br /> Hydrologic Conditions <br /> Groundwater seepage has been observed throughout the asphalt paved areas of the site. <br /> Shallow groundwater seepage was encountered directly below the asphalt while drilling <br /> Borings 6 and 7 and at depths ranging from 8 feet in Boring 9 to 14 and 15 feet, respectively, in <br /> Borings 6 and 7. We installed groundwater monitoring wells in four of the borings to determine <br /> if groundwater was contributing to the water expressed on the surface of the pavement. We <br /> also installed pressure transducers in three of the standpipes (Borings 6, 7 and 9) where we <br /> Robinson Noble, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.