Laserfiche WebLink
Conclusions: The proposed development would not have the same positive characteristics if it were to <br /> comply with the development standard proposed to be modified. <br /> c) The arrangement of buildings and open spaces as they relate to other buildings and/or uses on the <br /> subject property and on surrounding properties. <br /> Findings:The development's design has located the proposed residential units furthest away from the <br /> neighboring single-family zoned properties to the north and placed them adjacent to a neighboring <br /> multiple-family development to the south. The proposal will meet all landscaping,screening,and <br /> open space requirements. <br /> Conclusions:The arrangement of buildings and open space are compatible with surrounding <br /> properties. <br /> d) Visual impact to surrounding properties caused by parking facilities in the proposed development <br /> and whether such impacts are less than would result from compliance with the development standards <br /> and/or design guidelines proposed to be modified. <br /> Findings:The proposed parking located between 19th Avenue SE and the building closest to 19th <br /> Avenue SE is located in the narrowest portion of the site.The proposed parking area will be setback <br /> roughly 43 feet from the front property line,exceeding the minimum setback requirement of 20 feet <br /> by an additional 23 feet.The roughly 43 feet between the front property line and the proposed parking <br /> will be landscaped with a combination of trees,shrubs,and ground cover.The area will also include a <br /> detention pond which will be landscaped.The neighboring developments to the south and northwest <br /> are existing multiple family developments. The adjacent development to the south has a stormwater <br /> detention pond located in the area off of 19th Avenue SE adjacent to the proposed parking areas. The <br /> detention pond and frontage area is landscaped and fenced from view.The property to the northwest <br /> is also landscaped in this area and screened from view. <br /> Conclusions:The subject property's narrowness limits the ability for the front of the lot to be <br /> developed with a multiple family structure.Developing this area with abundant landscaping and <br /> surface parking keeps the area open to the views of Silver Lake. The proposed parking located <br /> between the street and the building closest to the street does not create a visual impact greater than <br /> what would result from compliance with the development standards of the zone. <br /> e) If the development proposes greater building height than permitted by the zone in which the <br /> property is located,does the increase in building height result in an increase in the usable open space <br /> on the property over what would be provided by meeting the development standards and design <br /> guidelines proposed to be modified? <br /> Findings:The requested height modification does not propose a greater building height than permitted <br /> by the zone,which is 45 feet for structures located at least 50 feet from single-family zoned lots. The <br /> proposed height modification at the highest point of the pitched roof will be roughly 34.25 feet. The <br /> modification request does not increase the proposed density of the site thus does not increase the open <br /> space requirement.The proposed 16-unit multiple-family development is required to supply 2,400 <br /> square feet of open space.The design includes three open space areas throughout the site totaling <br /> 4,144 square feet of open space,far exceeding the minimum required per code. <br /> Conclusions: The height modification does not increase the open space square footage required by <br /> code.The proposed development exceeds the open space standards. <br /> } <br /> SMA16-008 <br /> Page S of 1 <br />