Laserfiche WebLink
fj If the development proposes greater building height than permitted by the zone in which the <br /> property is located,does the increase in building height impact the views or privacy of abutting <br /> residentially zoned properties? <br /> Findings:Only a small portion of the five residential structures require a modification from the height <br /> requirement to allow for the pitched roof design.Comments addressing concerns over the proposed <br /> height during the public comment period were not received.The height modification does not <br /> increase potential gross square footage or added density thus does not impact privacy levels for <br /> abutting residential properties. <br /> Conclusions:The proposed development does not impact views or privacy of abutting residentially <br /> zoned properties. <br /> g) Does the proposed development result in a mix of permitted residential and commercial uses <br /> allowed by the zoning in which the property is located which would not result from compliance with <br /> the development standard s and/or design guidelines proposed to be modified? <br /> Findings:The proposed development is multiple family. <br /> Conclusions:This criterion does not apply. <br /> h) Does the proposed design mitigate the impacts that could be caused by relaxation of the standards <br /> which are proposed to be modified? <br /> Findings:The proposed locations of the residential structures are located away from the single-family <br /> residences to the north and closer to the multiple-family development to the sou h. The proposed <br /> modification does not increase the unit count or gross square footage of the structures. The <br /> modification allows the proposed design to reflect the predominant building roof configuration of the <br /> residential structures in the neighborhood. <br /> The proposed parking located between 19th Avenue SE and the structure closest to 19th Avenue SE <br /> will result in several of the dwellings having a view of the lake as this area will not be developed with <br /> a structure.The proposed location is also setback from the front property line more than twice as far <br /> as what the zoning code requires for structures adding to the streetscape with addition landscaping. <br /> Conclusions:The proposed design mitigates the impacts from the modified code standards. <br /> PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISION <br /> WETLAND BUFFER WIDTH AVERAGING <br /> RFVII 16-013 <br /> Section 19.37.110.D.of the Everett Municipal Code(EMC)states that"The city may allow buffer <br /> width averaging;provided,that the total area on the lot contained within the buffer is not less than <br /> that required within the standard buffer,and that averaging,will not reduce the wetland functions. <br /> Buffer width averaging shall not adversely impact the functions and values of the wetland.The <br /> adjusted minimum buffer width shall not be less than seventy-five percent of the standard buffer <br /> width." <br /> Information contained in a study prepared by Wetland Resources,Inc. dated September 26,2016 <br /> included the following information: <br /> (jF <br /> S U -008 <br /> Page 6 of 1.3 <br />