My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1970/08/12 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1970/08/12 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:13:29 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 6:05:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/12/1970
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lig <br /> you would gust havc to look at the general location where the <br /> permit is to be <br /> d to say ycs or no to it. A report from <br /> the Council s been easked <br /> , Council does not have any,urisdiction to issuing the permits. <br /> wor. aneT`Tugcl' net act as an APPeal Board,but they can make <br /> their <br /> known and he felt that this is what the Planning <br /> commissioninewas asking of the Councilvfor this typeof action. <br /> Frank <br /> lanning DIreOGOI,appeared and said he was <br /> Bennett, <br /> this pfor the <br /> u_ . Council aware of this <br /> rticular <br /> sac. �..... the Planning mmismatter. ge said a sionaw eCouncif request.l's <br /> this <br /> eld isop10thatnon the <br /> yo,i;g use permit to place four portable uildings o school property <br /> Colby, district adjacent to their dministra Building at 4730 <br /> nrScnool District that the foar portable enfdr <br /> Mr.Fred Messmer and Mr.Clarence Henning testified for the <br /> buildings <br /> would <br /> b <br /> aced <br /> h lbuilding.headquaers <br /> They d-beplfoundations, <br /> a ions,the <br /> attractively <br /> painted to match the existing permanent <br /> ao3 e_.. building.-andthere would thweand north <br /> neededsides to <br /> en them. They stated that the additional space <br /> is e bpresent <br /> or,;ante, functionS and that there woUld be no large increase in the <br /> arr,iio numbeposed the applicant stated.. answer to the questions <br /> 1buildingsd. 1 for eand <br /> of.audio and visual <br /> and <br /> stribution <br /> bshe oquo :. d r..IVing.. a g g, distribution of school books. <br /> 2. The functions to be performed in the buildings could be <br /> ;scraggy.olt done at another location; <br /> io buildings temporary but <br /> of <br /> 4, possible <br /> °ofte awould have north of the n theree <br /> om,ce to be icaeig JE future. <br /> neighborhoodApproximately 35 to 40 residents of the immediate <br /> n bi f f <br /> log JI <br /> liedi or the.spoke at least one time in opposition to the aPPlicatiCn. <br /> oppositionOne letter in .reasons for <br /> their oppositionfollowing; <br /> temporary,1. Portable buildings,although intended to be <br /> nodnalic , become permanent and unsightlystructures: <br /> I <br /> 2. The neighberhnod is good qUaiity,single 1'j <br /> family residential, <br /> land use,and portable structures andh administration <br /> es mot proposed usesmin <br /> of them �. <br /> would be even less conforming, <br /> 3. now at tet heparking is a serious problem days and evenings, 44, <br /> be h <br /> eve <br /> ings during <br /> e school year. Expended school functions <br /> and nP parking <br /> p oy s:i ould ase traffic <br /> ms, {" <br /> 4 functions thated for this location, 44 t/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.