1970/12/11 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Z18 chat eh. can be to create emploYmellt rather I than just create excess housing. This is my purPose of Preteating there,wes I that/should have been informed in the that this was a 235 project so 1 set forular meeting the al to theular cvecinwaste of public money. seemed odd to him that every other plat that has been Councilman langus said he doesn't have any questiona for Mr.Sellers,hut it efore the council,the planning Director brought the Plat .[,drub t type priceof a development it v.a,,.at there was no mentibn of anything that chamber,no meation of wha, ype of homes would be built in this development. I agree with Mr.Moore that.these 235 homes,we have an excess of them in the County,I think this is planned preyerty,v...theY thi. and if I bad known this at the time they preeented Ole plat Councilman/ensue said as a Councilman he feels that he in the re of Everett and he thinks mann E reLye.0,hulldingS.or semyeud the people have City of Everett art of our ct on them. If we have to approve the plat the,I think ,m should have some sort of idea of what type of deveLopment 19 going into these plats. I...the neighbors and the people in the area have a r.ght to this protection from the City Council. Walt Sellers..id he would-like to point out one ChingtotallY m familiar with this plat but he did know that the plat was db toof the property and that the proposed structures were under type of plenn}rbusinesa arrnngement with the owner and the people that,mre lg;to build the houses on th.struetures,andI don't believe that they got into this thing until the last couple of months,and when it went before the Planning Commission I don't believe tiMy I.don't believe they were aware of what the proposed development wee if any. as a plat,that they have a right to expect that that plat IKPresident Vognild said,Mr.Sellers,lac me ask this question. As long asthe property conforms with all a our aeuerurvanc,our ordinance requirements, would have will financing nM1 Walt/tellers said tIlis is correct,and no matter how Ili-advised the scene may be from fedefal governmental level,we o approve only e Councilman Dobler said the point:here is that the Subdivision epeaks the developnmnt of the physical land and the improvements placed on the euch s ch.water and sewage streets and eh.curbs and doaea,t speak at o any construction. In fact,that is taken care of at a separate time ] by the is taken out to construct a dwelling on it,which may correspond fairly close to the developmeit 'Of,.Piet t.lesS,not llappen fOr 4 or,years ater ch.development of the Plat. So it's two separate and distlnct related items that,,'re dealing with. W.Clear of 7pog Colby presented the follow..letter signed by 23 ProPertY ovmers or residents area of the propoaed plat. December 11,MD Chairman City Council City of Everett,Wash. get Plat 72nd and Colby Thia office represents the oomers of property adjacent to 72nd and Colby Ave.is Everett,as shown by the attached petition. 1 Such 0.5 approve of the.stand taken by ort ' - Su ch¢Everett tare nbby lo,lilaCouncilmen Moore and Callaghan P