Laserfiche WebLink
a ; <br /> June 2,1971 <br /> mself in the grouts that ahnrovcd tho rromiloling so he <br /> worigd hate see this project terrdhated or cvon post- <br /> twined finrt <br /> what Mr.Langus said. He really didn,think this was the <br /> were Psychological and were z g feelings coromical. He said he feltreasons <br /> • <br /> elt <br /> epCoungeneral y ford,one to s the confidenceainl that of the <br /> peo <br /> moie than it <br /> Moved by Councilman Rucker,seconded y lethento postpone <br /> further in January°of <br /> first instructed to ud d maintenance <br /> operation which he determines to be necessary as well g:.. <br /> ndividualsproceed with ark changes in CerM5 of the code which ains the <br /> building,bo re M <br /> employenecessary in terms of es and public. <br /> ma,or Anderson said he would like to answer Mr. ancomments regarding the economy. He said when this=us ±ling <br /> read,had been brought up a month ago,twO letters had been <br /> one from the Snohomish County Labor Council„ dthe r <br /> Council.from the Everett Building Trades of these <br /> otheandu urged the City <br /> employingto in gletters ape ed the remodeling p y Ede the eccrafts and o <br /> trade.' f labor Project <br /> remodeling <br /> s 1162,900,in other words,this was the amount <br /> that would eo directly to the laborers in the area. <br /> councilman Michelson said he felt the Cityp5ae dc1nits£fair <br /> 1971 the City of Everett has on t w <br /> share to provide jobs for e people <br /> awg y right now ine <br /> street <br /> projects alone,in the i <br /> f52e ,000 work <br /> He said there e$$00 amountworth of park p done <br /> in 1971. A service center !din <br /> goingstrocted which was ._,:mated to be in the oof$'!50,000, <br /> He said he certainly felt the City 0,00 doing s fair sare <br /> when they are anticipating spending ding in excess of$4,200,000 <br /> in this area. the fisc <br /> er <br /> portion Councilman <br /> the lm d postponed t s oftheremodeling of the motion which discussions <br /> s <br /> remhe felt odete strongly that the ling sthey e w talking <br /> ± <br /> 1400,000 t eede 1 <br /> the City da11 for the next ten years. Be srkd he couldn't <br /> f <br /> see the sense in postponing for six months the discussion <br /> and then start again on whether we wore coil.to <br /> cilme remode!or <br /> build a new one. He felt there were certain Counwho <br /> would vote for Mr.Rucker's motion because they wanted tO <br /> build a new City Hall. He said he wanted to co on record as <br /> being'in life Mut of f existing bus n9.che City Hall and getting e <br /> iunderstand h the a couldfeel <br /> Hall work- <br /> ing <br /> ylha under. He <br /> said the f conditions growth <br /> of 17,000 for i the City o and <br /> people.a maximum growth of 25,000 <br /> facilities it was very these additional 17,000 in evident <br /> not <br /> ron <br /> something to this bin lekk. He said the finance budget that <br /> of <br /> theyd 0 J said showed <br /> City gall up <br /> Mode o e yet the kainifinancialpayment of$99,000 would <br />