My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1971/06/30 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1971/06/30 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:22:58 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 6:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/30/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> June 30.,1971 <br /> TOTAL <br /> NUAL <br /> BIDDER FEF. EE COST 20 CITY <br /> lin9onac.$ 12.00 020,274.00 020,286.00Diamond <br /> rMotors <br /> 504.00 <br /> APCOA 5,352.00 33,404.40 38.756.40 <br /> He said no bid recommendation <br /> the Council has had pportunit7 to sevi.and the <br /> f 1) management <br /> (e ( sfactt n <br /> 1 (4) <br /> document, ystem <br /> tedin the bid provide <br /> parking operation services,1 1 ability 1 satisfactory° ingas desired by the City. (5)Rates other than that as aa ;parking facility USage Promotion Prearem, gg 1I <br /> dJ genera' <br /> by Wis.DowntownoParking Association with selection of the <br /> managing agent,DrurY E 1 1consulting Engineers <br /> et I kV:l <br /> on the construction of the parking garage had reviewed the <br /> Parking management proposals and had come upawith an estimated <br /> anna <br /> l operating expense for all three bidders based upon an <br /> annual gross dof.65budgetede ! s <br /> cost <br /> y each bidder..rather a momparison of <br /> pexpenses sach as wages,office supplies,insurance,and suchasmaintenanee,utilities,on-site supplies,etc.,based upon their d'. <br /> 60 <br /> own'current estimate. Mr.Drury <br /> 1 the <br /> comparision,only fixed.expenses are theSe which they t would <br /> not vary significantJy regardless of which firm actually managed - <br /> the facility. They had mome up with 1 .sea _cost to the <br /> .tI <br /> Diamond Parking.$28,854 <br /> APCOA9 Motors, <br /> 633,552 <br /> $41,318 <br /> To this was added non-operated expenses of$12,00.to each firmfor fire insurance and parking consul..fee services to �. <br /> mond f d f 500 and to A$60,654.00,Arlinrlington Motors,gton 0 Motors,bringingthe <br /> $36,65and total 2.00,aa R$43,018.00. <br /> He said although the Downtown'Parking Association has o further <br /> say in the parking garacm,he felt the Council had an obligation <br /> to see that It was operated in the most efficient manner possible. <br /> He said that Arlbngton Motors an..cost would be$6,000 Over <br /> Diamond PatEing and he felt alsb that Arlington Motors did rmt <br /> have the background or experienos s operating a Parking <br /> facility. He said nhe majority of the parkins committee e <br /> bidder;smownendstthetthe low awarded <br /> £the litye <br /> time the City wasn't satisfied with the rmnagermnt and any <br /> n <br /> the Council has full charge of the rat...and the icy and <br /> everything concernmd with the <br /> ➢I➢AWAA➢ Moved by: V,ouncilman Michelson <br /> that the-bid-for the operation of the parhing.garage <br /> awarded to the low bidder,Diamond Parking, d further thatat no time would any advertising he allowed'whatsoever in <br /> v ith the <br /> toperator such as heir name on the <br /> Councilmambangus said he felt that the difference in the <br /> prime between the second and low bidder of$6,000 spread <br /> over a 2 million dollar roject was not really very nt. <br /> I.said he noticed that Diamond Parking e from Seattle <br /> ,i4; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.