Laserfiche WebLink
June 30, 9y1"'-o.... <br />• <br /> and the rold Walsh <br /> ling localJ-k.Platt, Motor Bid businessmen wf cicteas a bid of ad Frank <br /> Of <br /> - These men have been in business in the <br /> y of Everett for <br /> ' many years d. would <br /> dobe run <br /> efficientlyjust as <br /> people brsome out of town:parking9 <br /> councilman Dobler said he thought if we were to limit it to <br /> local p =local management ethat been <br /> specified only, felt there_edh d they known that any outside. idon would t <br /> on be at this time to try and y that it would be only within the <br /> .. CityofEverett. <br /> - councilman Michelson understand how uld bid on the management of this parking facility <br /> ny <br /> • at only comp one dollar a said one bidde had id <br /> 5 <br /> consider5400 a month and the second low bid had bid <br /> - he could not understand how a company could possibly man <br /> f 'lity o 51 a month. He said <br /> also t3` facilitiesin <br /> the <br /> ssment <br /> ofEverett <br /> tryinto <br /> ronwte <br /> ese parking facilities or to improve the <br /> • th Councilman Langus <br /> thatrever one ties. He.-said he agreed knwsbM 1 i s <br /> sure they would work to thth degree to make this <br /> • <br /> garage <br /> a success so he was m g it. eopposen outside of <br /> g <br /> Councilmanhe felt there was just certain things <br /> th• ni c tely elow <br /> econsidered. <br /> b ded <br /> consider <br /> otheise. The second point he wanted to make was that <br /> they were in the business, a knew <br /> bow to run a parking facility whereas Arlington had <br /> flatly ility <br /> ackgroundethe whatsoeve=men they <br /> system• a a anexistence in the City of Everett. Number could <br /> tie a validation fourth was <br /> .. accepted. He said also that the Engineer and that the Council Committee had recommended <br /> had notified.the City that the City of Everett Architect <br /> positiongets aving always honored the low bid so,therefore, <br /> the Cityargument basically <br /> - that you could have for the <br /> second <br /> on <br /> Motors were that the,'were looai low bidder,a good <br /> would spend more imeand <br /> give <br /> -- parkingand <br /> op <br /> people a <br /> outside firm. <br /> n a11 <br /> these things out, <br /> favorof <br /> rding the bid to.e low b,der and only one in favOr <br /> of atsecond low bidder and that is that they are local <br /> • people. <br /> Councilman ty Tad <br /> • called for expds e bidder <br /> y had received de <br /> ,had <br /> the background= e <br /> felt that <br /> the low bidder was onlyhad full control of the one be <br /> hone the bid should awarded <br /> i to. <br /> had a <br /> Coun <br /> ilman Gebert said that he felt the Council <br /> d'clways <br /> been known bid and eing constructed,they had oeiv whenmany comm <br /> wasents <br /> banbuilding the <br /> e awarded <br /> w vett <br /> t was using <br /> Canadian <br /> the m 550,000 a <br /> felt the citizens 0fEverett approved ofthis. He said <br />