Laserfiche WebLink
218 July 13,1977 <br /> CONTINUED HEARING(CH776-226) <br /> 111 The continued <br /> axing was held on the aef .from <br /> the determination t nvironmentalmpact <br /> Statement is required <br /> for."Verelan Estates.. <br /> attorneyEd f appellant,reportea t council h <br /> Ythnning s residents o d some i... <br /> met <br /> hin terms of a and steet design f area <br /> ower and <br /> out of the plat b made. They had also provided a rain- <br /> age information t hstaff. requested.the�p remanded <br /> back to planning department for their approval. <br /> Moved by C Aldcroft,seconded by Co oilman J to POetPcne <br /> e hearing uindeldni sly:and remand the request back tocthe tp g e- <br /> [ <br /> Holl was <br /> inwith all oilmen votingexcept CouncilmannMichel- <br /> son who abstained an ncilman Gipsonwhoy <br /> how excused. <br /> Motion.Carried <br /> EVERPARE SUBLEASE 1CB776-218) <br /> IMI <br /> 6,1d <br /> TheapTrhooampoPsaeodn•s verpark Garage with the Public Auto Market <br /> oaofrfu ars was avnp <br /> st <br /> president ofthe autodealers in theobjected to the contract. <br /> { 4( tAdalignedbtlh rxted by legislation <br /> $11„ <br /> Mavedaay C eglman Lang souncelmendvot ung noilma 'hat'ha <br /> h Gipson <br /> �. quest fox a sublease of the Ev axk G e be de <br /> ( Roll w called with all c voting yes except oilman G <br /> who w sed. <br /> , I Motion Carried <br /> +11'7 <br /> 1'1,1; <br /> I, EPEC .PROPERTY USE PERMIT W2777-227) <br />$ R Reid Shockey reviewed the following memo presented to the council by <br /> Mayor Anderson. <br /> 74 Subsequent to the City meeting of July 6,1977,m <br /> staff <br /> If with R Nazarene ams, and Oveingthe Churchlable M1e <br /> o <br /> to discuss c policy and the options <br /> council forthe improvementofColby Avenue. <br /> Up to <br /> 7�} this t has been city policy to t participate r <br /> n the de <br /> velopmator recoastruction of residential,nonstreets. T <br /> he <br /> normal souof rce funds for such improvements is either the developer <br /> or through aOLID. (Which in this case la 20 percent <br /> Participation ion by thechurch,based on Propertyf frontage.) yr tion <br /> romthis policy wouldpee the city to very rave requests from <br /> d future developers and/orresidents. would,therefore,strongly recom- <br /> mend <br /> - <br /> men against deviation. <br />• <br /> 9 <br />