Laserfiche WebLink
31 <br /> 11 July 13,1977 219 <br /> cP <br /> 1 1 b <br /> ahi <br /> ch <br /> xt was <br /> reet overlay and <br /> design services. As <br /> ection of streets for inclusion <br /> i'driah9prthe <br /> hcould <br /> fdethe basic <br /> III' <br /> grading, ainngand wideningimovements toColby ithe city wouldidhest ^aov eaof I the eroggram v selecth eight greatest need^£ M1 hpreselectedstreets ncl0 M1 h any criteria rthan the othe street Be expedient <br /> aiena- <br /> ture this ethe precedent that would ser, cannotrecommend hatCouncil�aetthisapproach. <br /> program,nor <br /> 7. <br /> on <br /> 1' <br /> he. i Policy on providing engineering <br /> g ^that we <br /> xoul Coibuein a substantiveh len vng cots <br /> cuul 1 db g thi li em <br /> 1. Cature aPPli ,' <br /> i shouldcontributea engineeringservices fgue,with ortpublic <br /> facchat e <br /> i v ierequired of th applicant. ! , <br /> 2 etingef rma. Y in direct competition with private engi <br /> 3. The city 0 °mPeL Lh ,i <br /> with curbs,Olrequires <br /> t developers s to provide 3v foot wide Commission <br /> is _ arch improve <br /> The earning C csion r <br /> whether 1 recommending that d.church the question <br /> do road to gni- .�. <br /> y standard.participate <br /> the <br /> designin as sere �i Y <br /> we to 1 a mEoother d rs. a to <br /> would from her developers. eat which <br /> 4. if,improvtYCP xYioOmmtvn tht d 'a ie maY ibis necessary I f' II <br /> 325 feet.o Bison ]2ndn t,a additicnal ��'' <br /> 5 provideleheee c ty does n teryve the staff Cor budget ko '41' 'i <br /> engineering a ices, ', 1 <br /> theoabbove res _ recommend that this alternative be adopt <br /> /would drbysa ask cithat 5 £ eidiieckenoltdetermines provide these n <br /> 1 for that Staff <br /> ued+ £ includethisk i hes budgets I ��f <br /> £ pond t thisrequest. <br /> �1�, <br /> w a suggested by Reverend Ad h h h -might able to widenthe road <br /> 1!+�1 <br /> f.ey delay.pavin*gba portion church <br /> parking l tt+. <br /> has.allowed similar lays in e p long nave a time certain <br /> I�� <br /> when the.paving wall be done. ertavn M1 .. <br /> - - <br /> potential <br /> m summary,because etactparticipate precedent, <br /> 1 cannot t the eiY actively p 1 saring the cost c <br /> be t1k <br /> Iimpring Colby henowl' d 1 determine that auhpartivpatvonwouldaeirealg,then n0et ha mesit <br /> participation <br /> o discuss policycM1anginour to allowvmplentakinn he proposal." <br /> of <br /> Hugh McDowell, to representing church,a vd that any actiont1n9 them improvement ot Colby Avenue virtually kill <br /> r project. He said twould <br /> ba from before a :',M11':''1,111 <br /> '191 <br /> Cou <br /> first unit would evenbecoomppletedwere �ncilman.chelan asked the .Mr. oreplied$550w a ball park figure, that the engineering <br /> M1.men did not a detailed coat stimate on aprivate development. <br /> 1 I <br /> Councilman Michelson then a..if en <br /> church would pay any portion o I�,-� <br /> the c end A said that they would be happy to ay 20 pa <br /> cent or even more o£the coat of improving the street. <br /> (', <br />