Laserfiche WebLink
15 <br /> January 11,1978 <br /> Now therefore <br /> it re <br /> tachedele rafromdMayorhWilliamCE.M Everettouncil of the Cit of • <br /> CountyP.U.D.No.1 be,an is hereby,endorsed, re to the Snchomrsh <br /> : Roll was called <br /> who was excused,with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman Langus <br /> • <br /> Motion Carried <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • RESOLUTION(CA7712-453) <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Lloyd Henning,C Enginee,sadaomeetings since t last edrafted anon oop today. original resolution <br /> resent to the <br /> to the north for the <br /> eing <br /> this <br /> op- <br /> °y proposal n ealaanece hichnwoulddd o c rcause them uble.A new <br /> ho <br /> last <br /> ad p meeting nia ag. TdFtEa arfor access ta eOPoposal does not define aPoaitett orthaP red am the <br /> just 20hrAve- <br /> nue <br /> The PUD,Boeingan access <br /> eaC venue West at trey] Street. <br /> date an rcs)agreementin <br /> • the y regarding th r dev pment. be all <br /> between the Pup and <br /> Moved by Councilmanpiaci of secondedY Councilman Pope to adopt Resolu- <br /> • tion No.1398 as follows: <br /> solution endorsing a Snohomish Co4 and PUDunto <br /> tynue t ainter-localagreement tr0thh proposed development along e S.S.W.S. immedr • <br /> - <br /> . <br /> • a y east based 2Avenue west <br /> • County Whereas,ue City Everett has received request ,an <br /> Public Utility District PuN oof alternativesfor access theirodevelopment in the vicinity <br /> a <br /> w,eream,theEverett u <br /> city Council a t from t City Staff and <br /> thesubsequent <br /> follow a onclusionsthe eup s proposed act alternatives does have <br /> • <br /> 1) the past couple y y(on behalf a prop •erty owners) <br /> h • <br /> as rdalic fmoniesprovideto roadwayimprovementsin the vicinity of 5thSt which would p egrun <br /> ibes practical s to 20th Ave. y directional ramps a appropriate atenterhange improvements. <br /> 2) An at-grade intersection on 20th Ave. the v o£t <br /> Boeinging an interim Norbasth Perimeter <br /> or eRoadPis the most <br /> logical icea p iof access ( t- I� <br /> W.and south o 5 h St.S.W. (extended)�sthe rate east of 20th Ave. <br /> 3) Future <br /> developments <br /> ecer rzoaa andtheu0 weenacce20than beth A .of the w.,the City <br /> exis existing require <br /> gallorthrPeri of the $ <br /> lopment of this <br /> Intense devewell <br /> area east of 20th ehsection of 20th may wellr the of this <br /> ctional mP hr from 75th t°20th Ave gneeded. <br /> 51hpropose <br /> existing <br /> right-of-waytlyoand <br /> dedicate ficient right-of-way <br /> for a street and <br /> utireferred to as lities the <br /> astern boundary of err proposed to be referred t°as 16thAve.W. <br />