Laserfiche WebLink
160 <br /> May 10,1028 <br /> • <br /> 3. <br /> g wo <br /> page 3,section 110,paragraph G. He sald th,.paragraPh make..t trkoos- <br /> sNrt <br /> at any <br /> property unless sewers are available,or each <br /> ithin the plat pares. There are many cases where a lot <br /> that does not Bid 1 for ed solional play areafamily,d to aj Mr.Brandvold said the first e whr who <br /> to use the propertyoot require <br /> of uses <br /> a not <br /> tank or connection to a area or to build a garage,etc.any rsewer. <br /> sthe citiTen <br /> i this lot thinking he could build on it but <br /> then <br /> f afterward <br /> is <br /> was not possible because of no sewer book-up <br /> ior that a landafterwardsthat <br /> not pert. <br /> Councilman Baker agreed and said the city h responsibility a make sure <br /> J. the buy did not g involved in istypeof thing <br /> • <br /> Councilman to purchase <br /> would certainly ei thought Nat sort of thing bf a person was efore a <br /> Nt he he pu sod <br /> it <br /> nd <br /> uncilman <br /> ichelson agreed. <br /> trod26yubsec <br /> aotonMli c be amended to read as follows nldcroft that <br /> restrictions <br /> ec <br /> writtenthe s tNct which certifies <br /> these lots alll that <br /> o c appropriate t covenant provided <br /> acknowledges <br /> unsuitability of srre if sal and <br /> ich <br /> Enrcoftheothe City <br /> Engineer, poonecertification that such lots have either <br /> become percable or have sewers to e <br /> and/or <br /> restrictive <br /> covenant shall <br /> tayeesnoauth- <br /> written <br /> orized connection ton existing <br /> public nirsewer intavail . • <br /> Rolstal was called with all councilmen <br /> voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> • <br /> avoid Ne _ to ordinance on page 2,subsection 100, <br /> ' <br /> ndparagraph w thec ngineer m l <br /> proposed <br /> short subdiv fon epro b ataf art- <br /> ltcoordiw with future development e £adjacent contigu- <br /> ous <br /> owned the aHe said he <br /> ltthienire para- <br /> raps edeleted aplats s be allowed if they me the • <br /> requirements <br /> set <br /> etiforth i the ordinance and can to theeco para- <br /> reap <br /> Mr. felt the e Department e broad plans f the cityan <br /> the <br /> Enfinesy shouldh privilege nbt approving the <br /> plat i does conform with the Plannigv p tmenYs <br /> standards. <br /> Moved by Councilman Aseconded by Councilman Michelson to delete <br /> the second paragrapho£subsection 120 on page 3. <br /> Roll was called with all men voting Lang and Baker who voted no. <br /> yes eMotion Cen Overstreet, <br /> Carried <br /> next recommendation <br /> paragraph <br /> mu <br /> ,para- <br /> graph B. He said them o <br /> inch diameter sewer main be <br /> lied <br /> Yseptic tank lots. There are a number of alog wases where y t videcause oh <br /> e topo- <br />• <br /> graphy and/orsewers <br />• <br /> aacent <br /> syway of an easement. many plats contain easements across fordrainage They <br /> tsthere are certain ol <br /> direct sewage into a sanitary main,especially when those individual <br />