Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 161 <br /> May 10,1978 <br /> installedsewer beneath <br /> one. Thislsectiont. uld reworded to alb,f an individual s con- <br /> epliea'Nat if the line for s as brought only so far down <br /> the plat iandrt ed throughaneasement,ontYn times <br /> was developed 1 feetfarthernthesroad0r could <br /> t connect to <br /> citesewers dunles y laidextraeweroi <br /> developer seproperomo� felt rtt im£the nway <br /> asfront of <br /> ethe hc y wa g o to sewers in all areas o city. g <br /> moved by Councilman vxlderoftt,,seconded b Councilman Baker that subsection <br /> 160beamended b changing a tythe uend of:paragraph B semi- <br /> colon following w aprovided,however, connection <br /> leaseme private ii allowed,where in the opinicn <br /> ment of the <br /> propertyof the andsewer connectionto vs net technically E e. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motlon Carried <br /> c vd <br /> old t "said o page subsection 180,paragraph C •• <br /> s <br /> uld b <br /> - reworded to e <br /> allow for acceptable easement without having to file <br /> separateble <br /> for tition oand t tment. It wind bb im otnk knowledgeable p say prop saos denied ea <br /> ei'miaeds cs a nroen - <br /> unydedctBecause of the within <br /> the [ there aredesirable home that offer outstanding <br /> m <br /> ayviews that can areached by <br /> teeXiti or bay <br /> situated tdpublicly id <br /> viededP <br /> be felt h absolutely h <br /> an easement access to these <br /> desirable sites provided f. h properly df <br /> vtMr.Henning v] <br /> Spokeaid he thought the <br /> d hoc <br /> committee <br /> that <br /> tcdhao e. It was a t and subdivision <br /> i '. <br /> the p • <br /> ast.alloemanlacroft asked how these <br /> k <br /> this <br /> major- <br /> ity <br /> not pThompson,Administrative that <br /> _rob e sed be poor place. The b <br /> developer iotseot „baeyothe street and an <br /> consider No in of the development. <br /> pment. <br /> Biandvold replied thatpc of this subsection also <br /> that fronting on community bZ0estates <br /> agtfelt hhhshould <br /> beewe ”lots f - <br /> ino nosalb o sufffisufficient provide o <br /> de- <br /> quitturn-around, allow shall <br /> traffic o approachthe arterial <br /> other than back cut into t. <br /> Moved by c cilman Overstreet,seconded by c Michelson t - <br /> section 180,, <br /> paragraph aphC C beaccepteds presented in the ordinance. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> • <br /> Mr.Brandvold <br /> then said paragraph 9 s the n <br /> t on is oidinanceen <br /> allowed deport P regardless n <br /> con- <br /> figuration. e �u apparent within <br /> a pro raft w rewrittenwith- <br /> out "I <br /> notification o of two iiits reason <br /> panhandle <br /> • <br /> to a worded to felt this the grandaraouuld behstricken <br /> lots.entirely or at least are- -� <br />