Laserfiche WebLink
December 20,1978 SZS <br /> anssoo'Fae ifke • <br /> e <br /> egniervat s Sap <br /> vtinPi. <br /> me,etc. <br /> • <br /> deGnomMithelontanesggested that the proposed rateincrease be • <br /> hid Shockey,Community <br /> make <br /> decision on this as the state <br /> with nopfunding for cities to implement this law. tore had passed a law <br /> worksho aonAthe p posed ord b c hea g be h possibly at a <br /> P finance efore ifinal a p on. • <br /> • <br /> carnet,.Overstreet said <br /> vetreetd he would l <br /> three questiwasons answered thext workshopo p sed ordinance. wheta n hadthe nieiitaken <br /> this; [trtought ovolvingaharge examiner the city g to this <br /> is what <br /> s the procedure the building department <br /> when <br /> apersonc epp <br /> building permit,does he department issue asEPAcheckls[to theapplicant?ant? ! <br /> PresidentAldcroft then aaid another workshdp would be held on this in the <br /> near future. <br /> PROPOSED ANNEXATION POL/CY <br /> Reid althe Mayor and City Council created an a hannexation ia <br /> w <br /> firm set of <br /> committee scy committee an charged [ h t responsibility of developing sbywhich individual exaionscould eid the <br /> membersofthe <br /> wreBill <br /> u,dBert Cronin,Jr., <br /> Hll aFriel a Councilmen AldcoftMichelson and Pope. <br /> Between <br /> marchand <br /> June the commtemet almost w interviewing dexperts <br /> the issue <br /> ee • <br /> uiiinalyzdd,modified and accept afanafC ciitbefore <br /> the oncwas analyzed, <br /> circulation t staff and Council <br /> iatenea hat iv ess together onnea <br /> for community on annexation.He <br /> a the committee had decided not <br /> establish b for annexe- <br /> each request <br /> tion. They w.for annexationould establishScriteria for how a ounciries l should evaluate <br /> • <br /> He <br /> egpointed s council should v these a uer things thalnes,should t regulations. <br /> Thereisc however, <br /> commit°tion is ennsion t bide b guidelineConsistency demands where 1 <br /> bevery <br /> e achaguideline. However, <br /> dis- <br /> advaon ntages <br /> quest is the community.different a presents unique advantages and tdis- <br /> He <br /> aid the <br /> acommittee uthe <br /> following overall ion the city: shall b hepolicy of the City <br /> Everett ofopolicy •stefor <br /> r businesses to join • <br /> rathic sbou boundaries ice recognizes theothet detrimentaltt • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> existing <br /> area rsden key policy i .if naetrtsays that the city will admit ant ifi£i be shown <br /> that the <br /> community <br /> ln significantly effected <br /> y to <br /> • <br /> ervices <br /> ed <br /> being 1 <br /> the <br /> essentially a <br /> .a this htat sus ' privilege. <br /> Thi Syin yal that <br /> iffyby part <br /> ofyare <br /> ri fthc t n s w liot <br /> for <br /> i the mtwoeofctheaiedby"if not detrimental." should not bethe plicy cfsterraphice expansion all costs. nothing of being <br /> o population could b endousltieings services, quality f life and increasedax <br /> geogere is The r 6th in offset esa growths o approached carefully. <br />