My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979/02/14 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1979/02/14 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:56:21 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
2/14/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i1 68 <br />{ eebruaky 14 197Y <br /> i . <br /> thcpto av y d <br /> eaan} loHenn 9 t d <br /> 375 a <br /> He pointed little <br /> costsincludedproposed <br /> L.I.D. or acquiring right-of-way. assumed that thep <br /> prop- <br /> erty <br /> in -of w <br /> n <br /> poeskeh received <br /> writtent this Ps0Posed . <br /> the total oat of <br /> the improvement would have <br /> t led with the city. <br /> h then at 1 to go ahead with tIne property r <br /> they notified t city was pro- <br /> ceduruf L.I.D.while theygot tog d decided they would <br /> like oto this L.I.O. The meeting tonight s for onus purpose. <br /> a them e property slide f the area with ing <br /> a listing of 'oofez and the assessment they were being charge, <br /> at <br /> ntin d 1Haei es,In sa d ntact7 waa <br /> rnrfa ortoE thezpro3 act p erablycu d fvfteencyearico <br /> • <br /> eggy 5f P k favor b aid Ne ssessmenis, exving <br /> the v 721,co nt on propria of theca <br /> Will nSdnit l C ctlonko ot3eciea t thou wan t <br /> oue tablianed and said the prepoeed �p�w ld otnbenefit <br /> ..is firma at all.a <br /> nking C ugges sidewalk <br /> Paul Lbe e e e be <br /> could le eliminated to 7 He said g t proov- <br /> instavled 80th their <br /> the Cole objecting ha the n matted a time as not 11 of the members f <br /> notified ands s yet.Trust d has firm had an op on <br /> o t cola propeztyHaerd c r of <br /> sidewalks w <br /> ere <br /> I at was opposed es f portions Y a <br /> hef but <br /> k tely oPY Poa k xed <br /> vn an induscria a. He was definised <br /> Becker of kokoku had no opinion on the L.I.O. He said they would go <br /> with the majority. - <br /> I Ben Goodwin f Pepsi-Cola, known asM1Paris Mae Company on <br /> the assess- <br /> idpnotaL eowaslsidewalksnwhich he felt werednot necessary. <br /> that they i already ave <br /> 'nth'neat <br /> and <br /> f., vst s«eec an P,iea�o t e i�eivaeaain n sin .LM1. <br /> also a ked n d hprotestythis L and h <br /> e was <br /> 'informed t the ordinance would have be introduced a after the <br /> three <br /> Ings and finally <br /> adopted a therewovld b a 30 day period <br /> adoption that protests would be receivedalso. <br /> aura h u opcon and Route <br /> m 526 I spoke v would not realize but there <br /> Cior of <br /> ro d several new ms we b 9 n. <br /> stru 1 6 [ the L I C <br /> le <br /> ing <br /> cons coon. Ne urg the countit to sea e <br /> Ad <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.