Laserfiche WebLink
r1414 <br /> September 12,1979 <br /> e regular meeting of the Everett <br /> to order at <br /> i <br /> .. City <br /> called <br /> aicthe Council oe <br /> City, Mhelsonprie <br /> found attendance, <br /> ,� ll it was <br /> Baker a sea, <br /> f he 5a wereapprove <br /> printed, <br /> Minutes <br /> w, Councilman abstaining from voting.Et <br /> 1 EXECUTIVESESSION <br /> ao� bycuncil Langu seconded by Councilmen <br /> hold <br /> Executive Session immediately following the regupati g concerning <br /> personnel matter as requestedby the Mayor. <br /> @ Y <br /> Roll <br /> was c lewith alc n voting yes,excp Councilmen Baker <br /> and w ft,called <br /> axcuaed. <br /> x : Motion carried <br /> SIDEWALK AND STREET IMPROVEMENT VARIANCE REQUEST-ICE 799-403) <br /> Cela Strong of the Engineering Office said the City had received an <br /> andlGranddon t vnt a fire thattd ed the <br /> thenorthwest <br /> b buildingcorner <br /> this <br /> Year G aappl cation ireconstructtthe building n these �.. <br /> atlanaseprevdibuany a The applvchnt h o thh R <br /> Adlu t t %va vanc w ich it quire im t ave <br /> only 5 off-street eparkingespacesrinste of the 1 required: T appli- <br /> ha.also requested a public improvements b required in <br /> on <br /> , jjuun on with the reconstruction. This would b conflict w Ora,- <br /> es555-7E,which requires any new construction or <br /> remodeling 50 <br /> or more improve the street and sidewalk adjacent to the property. <br /> • She saidthere a ave Thefirst <br /> u <br /> ld <br /> b <br /> e <br /> to <br /> w <br /> a <br /> i <br /> v <br /> e <br /> the requirements ofthe ordinance issuance ewithout <br /> ! any change o existing publiici This was thtrequest of <br /> thepplicant,but has. acceptable practice clue oliability <br /> nd not being recommended by t p <br /> ub would require replacement f hazardous sidewalks <br /> existing which <br /> dneprovide for h parking <br /> {jY 1 rovidefar safe pedestrian m <br /> three()requires replacemeno hazardousg <br /> 1 d vides for aL.I.D.powery fwidening. <br /> This will potentially require the t property y k <br /> Im- <br /> provements mp lately and again at m h <br /> adopted widen the t. n 1 alternative would pd <br /> ' forsafe pedestrian movements. three(b)is to requfrethe <br /> applicant to make the complete street improvements and is recom- <br /> mended by the department. This provide for parking and pedestrians <br /> and continuity for vehicles traveling in the neighorhoo. <br /> P1pointed <br /> , asestreet a/g ,t e tGrand 1 <br /> s wider than <br /> west of Grand,and this would bring he 1 1 <br /> even with the easterly portion of Nall and also.provide fox some parallel <br /> SI <br /> E i' <br />