Laserfiche WebLink
415 <br /> September 12,1979 <br /> rkng, <br /> the north o se <br /> d imp <br /> street thie <br /> haieen widened and thelks put but mtatrdned o- yrequiring hcr a be widened <br /> u justthat the sidewalks be replaced. <br /> • <br /> Dolph ral len the petitioner,o timprove- <br /> ments <br /> het i s going bemey c <br /> anglethe tax the o thinkingaucause many iaHe said as far lyewak,he had been vnthis conditonfor y years and relas causing <br /> no problem. <br /> Moved by concilmaOverstreet,seconded by the to <br /> concur the recommendation miin Gipson,to <br /> applicableCity codes and under Ordinance 55s <br /> e,lnaiumber three 0,11. <br /> Roll w voting yes,except president Alacroft <br /> and Councilman Baker,who were excused. <br /> Motion Carried I <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked to be excused at this time. <br /> STREET/MPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS VARIANCE REQUEST- (CB 799-403) 1 <br /> An application access <br /> road on PUblic <br /> ri <br /> g <br /> ht- -w <br /> a <br /> from ypleof Sound platted received purpose of <br /> singlea new family opaving <br /> improved portion <br /> has approimately 8.i asphalt vrndownttoMBlvd. <br /> The existingunimproved sc telyudevelopedand werr <br /> with alder gether with the-muidelines developed and imrenspplyrng Ordinance Sprovisionsstpn • <br /> dimmediately <br /> of the ordinance would require.that <br /> a complete rd etprovement heabutting <br /> adorti of <br /> Sound Avenue, g = n <br /> one side, <br /> z es to ms` <br /> with the e o_tion of improved Sound e. There are 2other <br /> lot that benefit by this improvement,both sites undeveloped. <br /> He a w alternatives,o a private access <br /> o public right-of-way,w acceptable practice, <br /> s improvement,in- <br /> cluding end <br /> ment instead of a complete street improvements,and require an L.,. <br /> Power a <br /> orianaia beacceptable t les,drain <br /> agp is h right-of-way. Alter- <br /> native <br /> require improvements <br /> Ordinance 555-78, dhas applied <br /> ably 1 of single famvly <br /> or duPlex units were con- <br /> currently constructed <br /> • <br /> Thomas the applicant,s would not abject to <br /> sr walks u on a streetnthat had no srde'4alks.building riser, <br />