Laserfiche WebLink
October 3,1079 <br /> Councilman Gipson saide felt t k <br /> them by the aff. They r aid n have the expertiseto make these decisions <br /> without this help from the staff. <br /> Alen referred t d[ septPRDwas le a nea questionev ex the a an maallow c <br /> e faamilyy d veloppment here. He pointed Or.the <br /> 1p had sated t s are should re g family resi- <br /> dential <br /> ea-e l dwellings. <br /> He said iews should be given <br /> Rlso the law states that en the council is trying a decide whether the communitysarea has <br /> chatantial <br /> weinged. <br /> Al lend S <br /> sand euldemore clear tate sit ashe tidentffiab a <br /> eeffect. <br /> Fa.Kelm,of <br /> Snohomish C Builders,spoke in v of the ProPosal. <br /> He spoke against the 1 duplexes,and th <br /> questionedschools. He o pay for <br /> in <br /> Condition.10. He felt uthis nt etuired t <br /> type of development was needs me sewer as speci- <br /> fiedthis <br /> City.Gale Chism, <br /> of 4601 So.Fourth,also spoke against the development,as she <br /> 'I felt it would lower the <br /> quality of lifet <br /> surrounding <br /> area. <br /> Reid...eke,representing Pplicant,s first <br /> 1I1 t fticvd by July,1900. He s far <br /> Peck's <br /> 4 thisrequestedbtheiythatShadow <br /> u h d w Run and <br /> nod Dr. He also said that the Utiiitles <br /> Department <br /> requestedthat a extended to ewes <br /> Park <br /> IIDepartment <br /> ka hrequested this developmentShadow Run to <br /> malarger park area <br /> f He said he Sewer Department had told developer rthat the <br /> a new line as reservoir was ap- <br /> ' <br /> Department had also built. Se would <br /> problem <br /> ifelt the EIS <br /> was atitory and there was o re- <br /> A, view questioned by some of the speakers <br /> Bill Raker,of 5005 Glenwood,attorney representing the e[proposed developer, <br /> '1111 <br /> said he <br /> considerelt cumulativewstates that it improvements fromaknown improper lts said Shadow <br /> was not fact because it had at <br /> at no time would a ofthese proposalseen bevbeoretthe Council athe Council, donce. <br /> I I' of sxs was actually a fact o <br /> be considered ebytthe suggested that an and could <br /> l. <br /> Pat resident doroft felt it would a it would havema`definiteoper notimpacton the o consider hcommunity, <br /> ` along t <br /> time his Run <br /> tha <br /> de <br /> ison Park <br /> II, pplatsaker said he on wmightdisagreed,thet future improper a anyvoth de1e e <br /> brought before he C t people <br /> out onot da decide on <br /> how <br /> are <br /> g to <br /> pond on a local level <br /> t the <br /> larger Pthene[hen100f OOOsaddltiona additional City <br /> people <br /> allowgrowthwithin <br /> ity <br /> limits, farmlands and 1 C <br /> o Snohomish County <br /> in the fu would coveringbe <br /> large tracts all <br /> outareas the urban exactly as they have it in <br /> California. He said the City could not stop growth. <br />