Laserfiche WebLink
453 <br /> • <br /> October 3,1578 <br /> rd,of <br /> 08 <br /> oke <br /> the cilat think laboutother Dexter, <br /> othagainst oelopments ming <br /> on the in the area <br /> Sheebce of tedf8 the traffic and dasked the Cou ciluto cut down <br /> Bill pobler,of 9830 Glenhavene s about the traffic on Mukilteo <br /> Blvd. <br /> possibilities of <br /> fic flow <br /> ood and <br /> Lane. He felt the <br /> parking quirem'entsely explain the <br /> foff-street ni proposEIS did not ed sufficient <br /> because when the coda w dlpcdanmany <br /> stseet parking off-street. He - <br /> -ways in <br /> the de.development should be e e take care parking on the <br /> str • <br /> Marilyn Sudas,of215 Capri Rla s against poke ago t duplexes being <br /> f the lat. con- <br /> structedof Evans,of 5e18 East e,feat the allowed. Sheaof lsoasked a de- <br /> creased development s <br /> look at the overall p ofthem developments sh proposed <br /> o <br /> v e future for this being p <br /> _ ran" <br /> v""r <br /> brach commeed the inton �aene a now. ez5 Beck a ox., <br /> Ter <br /> sa <br /> eSchmier,0 l9 W.Highland,asked a the sewer coming from!soark and through Shadow n t Elm. <br /> in tge public k c ended t <br /> to do thistoaelm t.by g a s.0 asements wculdehave t betobtainea <br /> Marcia <br /> as Fe dillof <br /> 5910 Beverly Said the noise el suss not <br /> t di. althe so that traffic,re •ntals,tala <br /> ,des thebasaid e eeonedtththepblichadac actually been ryrmp2eduplexes <br /> nowan ustarted in the beginning of the proposal. <br /> CNLroefw:!!0oae g poagapoposa, <br /> Bolger, <br /> of 6011 Beverly • <br /> Apartment s,spoke in f <br /> ao <br /> r of <br /> • <br /> the proposed plat, int satisfactory and that <br /> e whole it has felt duplexes <br /> fainly did not warrant being called .at tYPe residences. <br /> Jim Allendorfeof 6301 Oceana representing the Save Our <br /> CommunityCommittee,compbsedo residents area, <br /> in favor <br /> o£ a limitationsby he P C Phasespoke <br /> regardinguplex construction. <br /> : tso said they e E <br /> d to the <br /> cording to State overlook thsimul- <br /> taneous haid eis <br /> acuiueffect,s should consider <br /> anddevelopments <br /> all the other deRun developments <br /> in the area. <br /> from the en inserted in the Madison Park EIS. <br /> The p • <br /> eople eopeinthearea and should not have been used for this plat. <br /> Councilman <br /> angus asked Mr. ! <br /> A t hethoughteCouncil <br /> should do, i <br /> ed the Council shouldthis proposed <br /> in the area. EIS had been presented for other proposeddevelopments <br />