Laserfiche WebLink
ITr71 <br /> 452 <br /> October 3,1979 <br /> • <br /> He said st they h signatures in <br /> opposition on June h,and another 152 signatures on July Sth,in <br /> Councilman <br /> cilope t en asked <br /> dtl <br /> when the <br /> reservoirbe construe and <br /> MoThompson <br /> about,. Councilman Overatreet then asked the Southwest Everett <br /> t was eastof the area be g overe uby, <br /> Mr.Ervine replied this plat <br /> the <br /> Southwest Everett Study. <br /> • mpigtand a <br /> an <br /> d Mr <br /> Ervine eledh Department had stated <br /> , major impact o should plat approved,and the <br /> Police Department <br /> oproject would result a4 z <br /> s <br /> increase service. <br /> there <br /> seand Mr.Ervine replied the <br /> ants <br /> 11 ; were not the same and,as far as he know,there was no connect/on. <br /> Wvlcopx,oh 306 6 h,both snnan an <br /> favor of the prop ev,handnp early e e ghvy of duplex t ts. <br /> 0 60 a leer a of the duplexes <br /> Al• 1 6811and015yBL 1 p f he Project,, <br /> 1I as he felt Mr.0 6worked lPlanning to builom v o d development. <br /> against the conditions y the good <br /> j$j A 4_ Ralph McDougal,o Highland h e project <br />"� i9 F111 he felt thwest area. He felt <br /> the was was workingement Commattea.was meeting and should <br /> ' 13 1 not be approved u f ni <br /> of 5024 Dogwood,spoke against the <br /> 'VG�y� traffic <br /> ins street insteadofEvergreen Way.Do Beverly <br /> ent because <br /> of t rafdfic o development <br /> F riffusin instead <br /> � Lake u increased already e <br /> poke against <br /> be- <br /> cause <br /> au• eeofuoi <br /> the many development gngin which will <br /> area. a any problems. <br /> Ialso c he traffic alsoin <br /> Al Karen Jones,56 et Lane amuse Lthe Anderson,of 405 Magnolia,both <br /> spoke a development b of traffic,s <br /> a lowwater pressure. <br /> f.h tI Jos Fordo wood,asks if developer could t <br /> hiss, n what of <br /> e0w c forhis development after the Planning <br /> Commission had made their n public hearing,and the answer <br /> asset r cv at ble for him to regumb r itiohs. <br /> dtfe re shhhat this was ouldabe lid n theduplexes n area <br /> 1 srthisslwprimarily a single finei,'residen she also spoke <br /> abouthe traffic.ef3o4th a .,o and builder o duolexes v <br /> hen60o Ocblock on¢evnrly Lane,cpokewin favor of tM1e level pm nc. <br /> eSpangler,af0 a spoke ed <br /> there were <br /> ,- <br /> no sidewalks in,hsurrounding felt <br /> i influx o the Beverly Lake condominiums,and with this <br /> additional plat,there would be problems. <br />