Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 651 1 <br /> o <br /> November 14,1979 j <br /> president x ft asked a could andor the 3 <br /> ethee generalstatementssubmitted ataou= Management <br /> tedd by"thee Council Si accepted by <br /> Plantate of that an said t process Washy ion on this.permitea Oepaitmecould Ecology a tnd akes <br /> f -day timegoes <br /> chea n t <br /> petition athe Department ecology t the Council's o d ionhavwas notpre <br /> onformancesw othe M ology end They would <br /> would <br /> either their ec tify o tvidence to the DePartment heir appeal. f were <br /> erti ted it <br /> HearingsrBo d theCitywouldbebefore <br /> . would go to the Shoreline <br /> that Board arguing the case. <br /> President xldcroft t asked what other department <br /> ein the <br /> State <br /> would <br /> be to <br /> anding this action or any action Mr.Greg a said the entaofuEcology was a my <br /> department. <br /> CouMichelson wasco n aboutdrinking water and said <br /> therne wa and how <br /> nmanyepeople were on i readGregoirehow <br /> many <br /> would b line <br /> who would pay for larger.line Mr. <br /> epliedet problem f ire flow,but he Utility part- <br /> hseed thiline a adequate to meet the needs of this project. <br /> The tc problem of was larger line is an i t should be addedas 1 <br /> tharequire <br /> is e policy t i y has develoed,m rojects coming i <br /> the td v to pay proportionate share. <br /> e e r in the basis of view o be done <br /> byuthe Planning ncilman es kedtreet was sifdthe annual report has <br /> been <br /> accom- <br /> plished and if s happening f nevi <br /> ire <br /> said theannual r t been accomplished,but a review f in- <br /> ventory p it 1.4 h v knowledge o <br /> v t mot issued and identified some aproblems with Project..f said <br /> last the <br /> uyear etheyedid g an estudy at year they will <br /> M <br /> propose am en askedwhatSPark ilver <br /> 1 bas <br /> eingarea, <br /> us.considerablyMrstreet h Gregoire hand with h showed <br /> more that <br /> thetCounty her would <br /> be additional P ean a dtfexTm publicly-own. aline in <br /> the Silver Lake area. <br /> Cousteel whether the issue of ingress-egress <br /> fr <br /> om them`Overstreettheebeach was ddressed and Mr..Gregoiresaid <br /> no it ams in this case not, <br /> tbut they <br /> look at <br /> existing publicly-owned areas ��I <br /> ach <br /> askedhowmanyhones will be affected by not laving u <br /> a view,and Mx Gregoire said 2. <br /> Councilman addressing the problem <br /> councilman concerned nwthieerepoxt�oand Gregoire <br /> that t Marshal has approved the eprovision of fire pumPa from t <br /> Lake for an exclusion protection system. This system would have <br /> he <br /> eda provided with a ase f <br /> power pressurized <br /> lurerand ma would need atoo bethe 45izid for <br /> fire <br /> flew requa.ire- <br /> ments <br /> '� <br /> Utility the of e property a condation should <br /> are wthat i their proportionate e sbaredof9thupgrading } <br /> ftheincluded that t or <br /> o£the lift station. <br /> theDennis 201 impact study bin <br /> worked onrand s a Utility iisvworking on thein y <br /> f sizingtand design for sewer facilities 2 yearn assess- <br /> mentdesill t tee a undertaken <br /> ize <br /> the <br /> facilities whichareclosing in on safe capacity limits. <br /> �5 <br />