Laserfiche WebLink
• 552 <br /> November 19,1979 <br /> Councilman Gipson a Council does t P shoreline permit <br /> could y net a permit elsewhere and could could bbuilt,and <br /> Mt rinks replies p o 100 units how b . <br /> cilmah Baker asked ifta 9uire[,and Mr ervckaon stated <br /> that was ie decision a e he felLri needed. <br /> . Aim <br /> munity <br /> rted <br /> thata h lasFemeetingting the she maadVe tcake tfort a publicsabout exp n <br /> d howtthe needshavechanged and ahowsi willaffectdevelopmentai on <br /> The�" future. <br /> • Ne 5 elidete: that;aee ndteetFeodsrvel ee n t <br /> c <br /> onnform to f <br /> existing residential patterns. <br /> • <br /> eeecaoeiormkeedehkeSMealheaon theeewaepeehtenthet odithathcnf <br /> o[med. <br /> esiaent Alac=oft asked Miss Seatons what sh voula like t see done with <br /> e property,a d replied that she wouldlike t aarea se a a s pre-. <br /> served fora park as a naturalextension to Silver Lake 9 Beach. <br /> nc ilman L u asked i she was against condominiums in Everett,and <br /> Mvee Seaton said no ee long a they elenmed. <br /> 11623 W Silver Lake t.,requested Nat the <br /> following <br /> • <br /> letter be masa a matter df radars. <br /> Council Member and Mayo=,I am <br /> "Honorabletting the following c on theBottum Condominiums project <br /> aubmi a fected property wn nsGilmerLake d a e ho has been <br /> • bo th a for the 8 community <br /> for may yearn <br /> involnddin planting affirming not zoning ad- <br /> jacent <br /> - <br /> anenta that after both <br /> severang andl <br /> comprehensive planning studis and <br /> w <br /> specific <br /> C bo actions,theC il might n consider reversing <br /> g <br /> etselfhatptheeve imome t is sed to implement the Ca <br /> policies. y fear i that ten years of local planning mad,crebe <br /> tendety red <br /> yews b and,than as a result the meaningless <br /> policies will be ery s ardized. <br /> obviously,Ila eaa�direct interestin the outcome of the Bonne ex. <br /> I own propertywhicho 4 and have planned for many yearsmtotwhich is zoned could a that have concealed <br /> de- <br /> velop it accordingly.g Nobody put knows me c worse, e- <br /> / cause this fact. gained a reputation forpersistence to confirm its policies <br /> f the many ver L I have that <br /> my <br /> thc, be <br /> with 1960gwhe to annexation <br /> aka so that pldue only be asked the arming <br /> • <br /> • Commission to 1960 when a e thetcur a ntynzoning o Multiple Residential. <br /> The commission rresponded that it couldrent "see o great <br /> immediate i atunaer- <br /> rob- <br /> sto vm the continuation of the Pmadenafter ani xat Analysis of <br /> under- <br /> stood at furzoning tooher k chewould <br /> terepart of a year,but 3n November,1969, <br /> permanent z w better <br /> s property.. n. <br /> • he - Ding as adopted ffor <br /> Beginning in 1973,a lulling Si Silver <br /> Master plan w developed study, <br /> ddy,I entered <br /> City's <br /> mons w at he sale o u pr 1 for <br /> r d <br /> waterfront City Beach.with the iscdiscussifor ns gr ale oof f my 1973 PPark <br /> Peel ed my property de grew designatedfora v ition• and <br /> expansion <br /> Space City <br /> showed my Pro interest In the <br /> • cathepCaty Council in August,P1974 declfnedaa1975nee5horeline <br /> acquisition a�the matter was clod h property for recreation <br /> est er plan was adopted designating <br /> get City Beach <br />• <br /> and my property f ban nt. <br />