Laserfiche WebLink
553 3 <br /> [November 19,1979 <br /> matter• f public interest <br /> • myeprope tyther nwasediscussed inntal or ndel during the d development of a that <br /> st <br /> specific rpoli h'e defined for detail durinand g <br /> s fair wasand thaim- 1 <br /> partialthe perty e would say thohld remain inat private <br /> matter was decided once and far <br /> all a that point <br /> • <br /> es following,several programs w begun t <br /> _ in thefor park facilities in <br /> s=l area. <br /> From t <br /> s <br /> Conceptual <br /> Master Plan was developed which aadditionalandw <br /> a <br /> s <br /> studped na rejected. All modernization Cthe <br /> • <br /> property. is my understanding that = ars atillin efex <br /> recognize <br /> at thecurrently <br /> = ur entlyg deal of disco girding <br /> hdogins of area evu ask the Chu con- <br /> . <br /> sides the fireeaofsuch a sotne's <br /> c <br /> we <br /> after substantialexpense, ingaplan <br /> Which meets all of <br /> the ordinances and po policies which existed for years;and <br /> ' <br /> unfairness cme, properteh been ed eoaa y tames with <br /> he ams conclusion regarding zoning and ownership. <br /> Thet be a which t re-planning and re-thinking ends <br /> and tthe usdoine begins. Continualchangingofi ,Plans Policies <br /> • and zones r confusethose who would invest timeandble <br /> de- <br /> . <br /> - <br /> ney insa answering the needs of t unity throuness gh risk develop- <br /> , <br /> eve - <br /> velhpment nproposals. The resulting=t Community <br /> comm r its o <br /> ht of such proposals will aero rinity n <br /> citizens. h <br /> will not harp on the legal aspects of what ibeing <br /> considered. <br /> You ld <br /> apparently are reivinample advice on hat. goWevreou <br /> summarize-by pointing out substantial record edeveloped <br /> ey� which y agreement with and en- <br /> cou <br /> ragmnof 4 ion Aver Lake. b' <br /> andsave id making o na <br /> • and I would ask h this policy.. <br /> Councilman nope inked StrathY=f he had ever made he statement <br /> that 's ng a= tee lake,end he pa yes <br /> f <br /> he clarified that itwboo£a mechanical malfunction, '..` <br /> otherwise he felt <br /> ttthe sewers were adequate. <br /> 1 <br /> Ed Kane,1215-118th eke S .,reported that he did not <br /> know d <br /> the property was n he market.EHe felt a good use a property <br /> would be to short plat i[into 4 lots E use Hebelieveda <br /> person should be than de dofwhat <br /> 5 story uilding 30his <br /> 'Hfromphisehouse. <br /> but did not like t idea , <br /> Raymond P n,Attorney,spoke o behalf of the developers of <br /> lope said that uwhetherna shoreline management Permit if N'� <br /> the <br /> wased be ie ued is the i e stated i would be a would there <br /> s strip pare around the lake,buthes ProPett[o do tris the <br /> criteriahave th wand ntil an the feere lt v <br /> be must de be established andud alt they have done this. <br /> CouncilmanG asked if t as a low-incomeear tand i Mr <br /> Peterso.hiebknowledge. <br /> ep tbacne { <br /> k half sof thenproperty w 3333833383338838881333±arately theyecddlafd lop <br /> that portion to the maximum. <br /> Bothe,own ofet a property under discussion,rtseberatea <br /> that sPauline <br /> lens bei suabandebought bthis property in n <br /> d as no conveniences they pars fox to ephone in a wide bhles9andatheY f= s gave <br /> wo...men.'eeded o argue said they ret 2 acres oflt etuldwere nheneeaed 1 need forethesland for housing <br /> orig- <br /> inal 1 purchaseduntil!here s a <br /> E <br /> d <br />