Laserfiche WebLink
_ 509... Si <br /> cecember 12,1979 <br /> It is intended o preserve natural drainage c avoid i .� <br /> es low without flooaway.g <br /> fMr.Emvine reportedthat <br /> currentlyrestrictions on the Lorimer Rd.is No ea <br /> should be placed in anarr increased elopment would a g - <br /> vete current problems. <br /> that the C r n 1970 granted <br /> n innreported interim to ruviewA-1 zoning(applied to ProPertY <br /> with <br /> slopes greater than <br /> ( also <br /> ontt date R-S• e(appliedto • <br /> property with less than15aoeag granted as a permanent zoning. <br /> Afterconsidering testimony,the Planning Commission made the.following <br /> findings <br /> • <br /> 1. ro significant evideocn H-l. <br /> 2. significant change has red in this area in the last year <br /> to rat .t <br /> change o R-. <br /> 3. public <br /> need exists change t R-1. <br /> 4. Role is not compatible with the natuke of the <br /> 5: Topography is unsuitablesup t - <br /> 6. Soils are unstable. <br /> 7. Drainage <br /> in <br /> extreme. <br /> 8. Halperin Plandoesn'tsupport R-1 osteep <br /> g, improvements weld require <br /> substantial cap <br /> y and <br /> are not a reasonper se o ncougmblegrowth. <br /> 10:The Steep Slope Ordinance providesfor more <br /> development in R-1 <br /> an - n area t support i. <br /> 11 TheLowell/Larimer Road existing problems and cannot enggort <br /> significant gr <br /> 12. the health,s welfare o hcitizens - <br /> vide 9f x less intens development o eeplyslopeda <br /> whereareas drainage problems due to renoff and soil conditions <br /> are prevalent." <br />' The Planning Commission recommended t rof...a re R sA andnd <br /> r <br /> that zoning of the denied eirtzo ears-5 portio.he reterim A-1 affirmed. - a <br /> i <br /> The City staff f hue recommendation withherr own finding <br /> recommendnd as follows:t <br /> A, ompxWrn rezne f <br /> ehily <br /> =od <br /> peveerto <br /> water system is sufficient to ea the subject property. <br /> C improvements lsf than 1$slope would require sub- <br /> stantial <br /> - <br /> ve <br /> aunadeysservice <br /> those <br /> p <br /> ropertes <br /> aonewolde adequately serve <br /> ethose pi <br /> s the <br /> sewer <br /> with a lift eaena the southern <br /> oehen� <br /> i7h00s properties a16 pcould be d • <br /> - <br /> sveloped he ,0 g f 1 in eR-1zneo <br /> service is provided h ensatyof development <br /> sewer <br /> s slopes.ngreater than would be dictated by a City's Steep Slope <br /> Ordinance. The R-1 density <br /> would tend to promote the construction <br /> of a impxosdr llcient residen- <br /> tial <br /> - <br /> t al density to h etnconomicay'feasible. <br />