Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br /> January 9,1980 <br /> P.U.D.SUB-STATION SITE-Ice 7913-531) <br /> spoke on behalf o the P.U.D. P.U.D.is faced <br /> no iTlat Hansennthan July e providing ear a vssub-station <br /> at ithatnthe a operation presently <br /> reserving a parcel SCity'seu ampsently • <br /> date a antat the ed 20thandwhich c {.: <br /> refusal ana for aaper pe.to hold riod years.giving the city the righsently there is an agreement t of forst <br /> Mr.Hansen <br /> orted that several sites were discussed but <br /> ite <br /> was es suited for many s <br /> and better <br /> mcenter of the proposed aintenance. <br /> energy isavingseas the sub-station well beoperation and there • <br /> close theloa <br /> a. <br /> Councilman Pope <br /> was concerned <br /> inter- <br /> section an thfuture and there would be a need for the ramps. <br /> Councilmen B and Gipsonc concurred Councilman that t ion old be built eshould <br /> maintain <br /> their <br /> nht off refusal on thereilndex oft e property and for the of theagreement. <br /> u h Wefthe Public Works Department, td that if ramps <br /> eadressedtheywouldconsider location.stated <br /> said I i <br /> P, <br /> several <br /> alternatives were ased and those options are still for <br /> futureneeds. <br /> stated at the Southwest <br /> at <br /> Everett Study not include nanalysisframps or of the ry <br /> Ja <br /> Councilman <br /> on <br /> elt that before the <br /> the exact size ofsthe(acreage should b specific. ate y property, <br /> Moved by Councilman Alddcr secondedbyMichelson, '� <br /> City relinquish tchosen site for the <br /> he right o firs a onnth <br /> [hdurationtright <br /> ofCfirst ere the re ii <br /> mavnaer of the propertyforretainthe <br /> of a agreement <br /> Councilman askedthe City haad t relinquishtheright o <br /> first an <br /> hat <br /> and still let P.U.D. <br /> the <br /> sub-station auntil l or ethe tdecisioneis made on how the roads will"beadeve ped. <br /> Diccould Tho tateda that <br /> e askedsub-station IMi <br /> Thompson ring De a <br /> a full design of directional ramps as the cost <br /> development was not , <br /> Bible. bvlvte c decided puntil ent recommended not doing g <br /> oa design could jtr <br /> be P and that a not worth doing. full <br /> Mr.Hansen said the district a <br /> we e <br /> willing to hold the . <br /> mainder of the property f he f sal also 'I <br /> and not s as othat this ergy w y notthohave the same u e as it is about 3 a s jtid <br /> Mayor Moore said <br /> City and that e .has cooperated <br /> naato hatyway with the 1 <br /> u Department atanyramps that need to b ill be put edirectional <br /> t [nould oeto with them as our pias ,.are M1 i property. <br /> o the of this property. He felt we'Roll was called on the nxtion with all voting yes. j_ <br /> Motion Carried <br />