Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br /> January 9,1980 <br /> APPEA. 1912-53y1 <br /> Hugh Warren,Public Workst, that to <br /> is Dep1,,jac,li to moDougal on 37th artment,The improvements imposedrbp a 19 <br /> SS.process luded pavingoft hegutters and the minor widening of el Putting rpon curbs anahES d <br /> Farrell, is asking p ed expa r relief of the ItemsGrayb4 B5 andn6 fr0m this checklist <br /> the <br /> on of <br /> g. <br /> curloc=s a onaing dg <br /> storms and bsndgu s aterare eded neio he s lve ihre p <br /> Councilman Ordinance 555-7e there <br /> showing of great hardship or an ale <br /> uirementP <br /> and d to waive improvements,and <br /> asked <br /> erwis no set standardbuta Power of Attorney s usuallya <br /> rren <br /> said theused. <br /> Councilman ballenot the advantage f requiring Mr_F re <br /> ll to <br /> blacktop an y could property did to and <br /> President s ,obowner area <br /> one has to ok at it on a long-term baissut did eel the cold <br /> be exceptions tho g <br /> Councilman have Baker <br /> said that if the variance were granted the reasons <br /> this substantially different <br /> thaun othersBi shown <br /> have improvements. If the <br /> ordi <br /> this is a different situation. she e costs <br /> thatnance is valid btheby veryon bvalid for this ty unless <br /> e <br /> lso City w these streetaid the s <br /> are lar properly <br /> properly built is much more expensive than when Sidewalks we <br /> sant this unless it is substantiallye and rdifferent and ofon of traffic no <br /> should not <br /> benefit to the city askedCouncilman Gipson improvement. <br /> wa <br /> rwhat action a the is taken <br /> kentonthised,but the appeal was before,and applicant <br /> aS the <br /> was not able to attendWarren said it was s the original meeting <br /> red wLh C=111man B siaeiac o POnlwhen <br /> nngoi h e alley e a p <br /> it is not goings to be used by the applicant. <br /> attorneyMr.Sill Ingram, for Mr Frrell, 0 555-a <br /> is causing problems to the City ce <br /> oe y a with <br /> standards. It violates equal protection,create.proere,bus <br /> and is a misapplication <br /> in this <br /> case with Mr.Farrell who is),legsor and is required <br /> le that lease to <br /> ay txeand <br /> assessments. <br /> mathe alydoes hav , <br /> but to raethe <br /> parFarrell, o avetlt <br /> approxfma ely$5,000ndthisis HeMcDougal <br /> ie an 80. <br /> right-of-way but is not improvedto a BOr <br /> it narrows <br /> as ail <br /> enter. In this <br /> t goes towards 38th <br /> situation for Mr.Farrell extend the <br /> existing. This is not in a t facility and to <br /> him to widen,as condition 3,and <br /> vide a roll curb,Condition 4, <br /> does not exercise good common sense. He suggestee that <br /> Attorney be furnished not to exceed 7 years <br /> d in that it <br /> stated <br /> that Mr.Farrell,his lessee or their <br /> rs,in the <br /> Utilitts to the property$.)or beI D.to limitedastthe right htetoaquestion the <br /> Movedksy Councilman gus,seconded by Councilman cel <br /> DCity eclaration the Building <br /> Non-Significance.and ngPermitwaive requirements45 andt <br /> 6 oft the <br />