My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/01/16 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/01/16 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:12:20 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:55:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/16/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1111. <br /> 31 <br /> Jany 16,1980 <br /> • <br /> The following letter was read from Mayor Moore. • <br /> il <br /> ASyounowmmyrfirst <br /> priority a improvements the City a <br /> street <br /> o improvements. <br /> the ballot this Also,asf you are ware,I hope o pat a bond <br /> issure <br /> 1v08 behind thB those improvements. ,how- <br /> . This has also been a top priority <br /> becomesand I uapport the bond issue. I willworkhard to see a one y it <br /> PUBLI NG-COMAUNITU DEVELOPMENT BLOCH GRANT PROGRAM '. <br /> President Overstreet <br /> announced that <br /> dspublic t enand hefelt t soet separate itha hearing would open and closed on each separate <br /> i�. <br /> Jasmine explained briefly the 3 resolutions before the Councilwere '1{ <br /> Block tGra program,and theo amend the 3 Year thirdspecific to make more <br /> hird was[e annualhousingcacty program. <br /> Cope,Bertha Chairman the yBlock <br /> G <br /> qxpldiedtstresoluteobeforethe [e resolution <br /> n <br /> genera <br /> aifiplan. a policy statement rprioritieIt is a <br /> ere <br /> sfor the allocation fblock grunt funs d kyears" 8)red part o the C dDevelopment Block Grant applica- <br /> tion atan h U.S.tpiare <br /> this <br /> activity <br /> ppiorties a geographic priorities. This strategyis t used a s guide <br /> block grant oringthen t 3 years. he Advisory heCity <br /> administration <br /> have recommended t activitieshepriorities be amended,moving the <br /> not thisreconstructionofmaisshould moved up to <br /> second i[y. hemoving of <br /> 11 1 <br /> four <br /> jor <br /> util <br /> from <br /> rom a <br /> ck <br /> ted <br /> it <br /> r.rovements are so <br /> en <br /> Grant 8�.ltn diachn i shift in Previously the <br /> Grant tl ielsoB ock rsccostly that 11 yeoauaofBokGrntsactivitynlkictunspriorityb because feasible,given was <br /> nlower priority <br /> HUD's policyisthat the Bockpriorities <br /> rehreflect <br /> r 1vEethefundedoutooC10PL Grantoran ethe <br /> event thatablishes a infrastructure Everettvll a record infra- <br /> structure <br /> improvements. This might also the City in obtainingso nds from other agencies having this as a second priority. E <br /> UD later <br /> program <br /> priority of I <br /> ==TIN Ahtanidothchow00wuoh""""d <br /> ngnd ;�r <br /> `F <br /> 8 <br /> Bunn <br /> be a maximum of „I <br /> cofff,of the Housing Authority,said the family f o would$12,000 a <br /> year, <br /> $13,000 for a <br /> would <br /> tofand$16,000 <br /> for a family of four. Half thatof course would bbe the lowincome rate. <br /> Duel v <br /> ved chebaring.Cm;11.ma Councilman Lan <br /> Pope,seconded by c <br /> qus,t0 close the <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. .I <br /> Motion carried <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.