Laserfiche WebLink
WaiMMIMMIMMMainialiffiliMailiggillgallirj <br /> 89 <br /> February 13,1980 <br /> Mayor Moore.said that.they have been trying to streamline the process <br /> Lad <br /> e d things up, only negative thought <br /> he had was the Ladho dn the and e <br /> low o housing.. consumer ' u a deterrent to <br /> Councilman Lenges was excused at thus time. <br /> DRAINAGE FUNDING DISCUSSION <br /> Clair Oliver,of the Public works <br /> Department,stated the proposed <br /> nage ordinanceaddressedthemterregional detention and <br /> additionalsection 17 be added <br /> regarding <br /> The <br /> fee <br /> schedule <br /> ne adfl tvf ctor. Me ex <br /> - <br /> plainedihecomputdionformulebased obuilding t fees. <br /> Dick Thompson,Administrative A said te 1975 c till <br /> being:used and inflation is in the Assistant, <br /> he building that keeps <br /> uin <br /> line th s P 000sedss <br /> ection 17 is a way of <br /> willgn have toibedamended that when they are changed this ordinance <br /> President o askefees so <br /> the w couldbechanged r staying <br /> ction <br /> 17 t ink withoutreferenceton inflationfactorands the <br /> ethird s and omiittinngireference <br /> Minflation facto tion 17 wouldread follows: <br /> nt17. Fees <br /> 1. T he£13 fee scedule shall apply where a detailed drainage <br /> planis <br /> Whererequired,which schedule is in addition to other applicable `� <br /> drainage plan involves several of the permits <br /> a PPl <br /> ro s listed low,the highest ingle fee shell apply. or <br /> (a) Building Permits,159 o current building permit fee <br /> Oa) Subdivisions: $100+$10 per lot :O <br /> (c) Subdivisions:$50+$10 per lot �$ <br /> (d) Other Actions Requiring Pbrmats:$50 <br /> cvlmep B ar and g p i h £ viand,be coneldezed et t 'I II <br /> same time heath:bul d hs <br /> wOliver reported the Subregional Drainage C t e <br /> point f choosing and it v likely they Committee <br /> recommend North <br /> creek. <br /> involved in Ien tvhispdeo 1 madetheCity Everettofywill be heavily . <br /> Mr:010e0rem a$3 per year 1 '.b coming <br /> into present theI j <br /> fund <br /> 51.0 Per m structure is pestablished Lheihn s elm.draSYnag <br /> single fresidence.will se offered a in e proposal whereby <br /> fid for e <br /> additi $1 0 nthincrreas bchargedf singleofamily <br /> 1,000 f lt.,. produce <br /> � '1 <br /> residencef$130 per age r$5000 per year,opposed to <br /> the <br /> $300,00. he equityofthis method vs.the existing rat the <br /> possibility of increasing.commercial users only should beconsidered. <br /> Dick Thompsooue an said todayhe :s discussion w to get Council exposed to <br /> te ilable, suggestions and alternatives <br /> can besmade a what method should be taken. <br /> pl ) <br />