My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/04/30 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/04/30 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:13:15 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:03:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
4/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
210 <br /> April 30,1980 <br />-1C felt housing n addressed <br /> by tin as <br /> holier £by other legys- <br /> lation <br /> hrough <br /> he Council. He felt <br /> crisis in Everett <br /> which junite <br /> are in ustified <br /> antthis <br /> checking Theo et1170ca ed tint not s,1729 gb <br /> In fact,counting some proposedprojects just outside the City limits <br /> new ones 0 units were on h <br /> b y built. es Shadow nhousing need 0 tedBoeing <br /> and wFluk and coming w companies <br /> 3500 n ghired.th Hefelts hthese ew livingin <br /> other areas. Obviously, re were plenty of housing units for this addition- <br /> al increase in populate <br /> He and stated <br /> dent tM1 wineer didhno Cwith th traffic <br /> conditions traffic <br /> bynt Planning staff. He reviewed en <br /> from <br /> movarious portions of the E15.subeagain h he <br /> He <br /> out that by a court case the views of the citizens must be given <br /> tantial weight as to <br /> use of the property and <br /> 1, council he was representing900 citizens in h area. <br /> Dale <br /> ... !a.. Peters, 909 Wood <br /> Place,also spoke against the pre because <br /> feaovf <br /> additional traffic, . <br /> ti" Clara Emory, of B against <br /> 4 development. felt of it were single fam y homes there <br /> uudo tbe <br /> 1, such <br /> a em. <br /> {11 I Ed Carlin of 5310 W Highland Road also gueptioned the proPoeed Project. <br /> I, Reid cad newsletter then noted that in a bI� 1y had made this was 3 y <br /> which w in error. multiple units to BO <br /> original proposal. <br /> Regh it fele that wubilteo syvd.was a major arterial <br /> t b <br />{{'# een outlined in the Halprin <br /> II tut i thou <br /> the h <br /> o provide a guideline <br /> possible 4 ian are e <br /> i <br /> non a otheobservatioand e ala changes. Recommendations in the proposals alternatives. <br /> He said rthat iGr. <br /> endo fir's c the 1 ould not even <br /> considered as the m f them were n vn the near vicinity of this <br /> povedc by hearing.Councilman Lan a,seconded Councilman Michelson,to close he <br /> Roll was called th all Councilumn voting yes,exceptCouncilnmn Gipson, <br /> who was excused. Motionarried <br /> ' Councilman Michelson <br /> opposed <br /> y <br /> opposed o the width of the one and access <br /> abeaccess t prof nd that th p posedlaccess <br /> should be wider. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.