Laserfiche WebLink
M 284 <br /> I4 <br /> Sone 18,1980 <br />")Ied b Councilman e 1 <br /> seconded bymCounci Michelson,to continue <br /> the public hearing guntil'7 :00 p. m., y 16,1980. <br /> led w acl cow °twho vas e d eaident overatreet, <br /> who voted ne, nd Coun'Loan Aldc[e Et, xcuae. <br />.0 Motion Carried <br /> ATRAFFIC <br /> MBeside0nt OvewetxeetstatedPOLICY <br /> 0L0eformat on this natter would be handled a <br /> was to <br /> gather background <br /> iformation andphear comments c hearingublithe epurpose publiic relative <br /> to the matter hand. <br /> ) Dennis <br /> ckson,of <br /> presented <br /> rcand on <br /> isti B nditilons,the Pus a Department, <br /> street,configurard and ation, <br /> ac <br /> volumes,,of goer 0ectedec capaed city <br /> of thea t community <br /> volume,n edcf intersection a.d main <br /> ct <br /> O as <br /> w loots and <br /> plats°onntomukoiltebeBlvd.arterial said <br /> accethev� <br /> newthe <br /> Council t would Ail, f <br />{f'4-I CouncilmanM Michelson <br /> said <br /> dhe feltthat <br /> or it Councilhaddiscussed this matter <br /> sometime ago c dr see the need f nc w <br /> aro t immediate a due <br />'tt6� `� fe w future <br /> policy s ouidPb formulated ao that staff and developers but <br /> �! knoow lt when d'en area stools be <br /> Councs felt each development i ar addressed <br /> I� 11� singularlyn n its own merits. n that o <br /> Pope,seconded <br /> Michels from to hear <br /> ),{ 1C' <br /> Moved bic ce nto g t formal presentation r the staff on <br /> �.' thelMu Traffic Policy. <br /> kvlteo B <br /> z -'"t Roll was called with al unclnvoting o,except Mvcheleon <br /> an Pope,who voted yes,and Coue1lmanAdcroft,who <br /> was excused. <br /> Motion Failed <br /> Gregor.,aonnis o briefly covered past Plat and <br /> . proposals that had been ndeniedpby Department, <br /> y i thisarea <br /> because <br /> of <br /> a and t problems which would °n MokiltivdHe said eo Blvd. <br /> and theythe City had an favored a writtenwstatementlofyof no p0 icy tocess thison toeffect <br /> whether Council had Hyl COatcilmenallow ol.aSkeO aanymore et Muk,City icteo B the <br /> stated iitynce rove case here there is a which ac wouldvce of b used.pess olicy ther than eeofly. <br /> the I ', laymen nlat or FRG,but wher developsome Blvd.is theyoi y access <br /> 6 I I... would be difficult to apply this Poicy. <br />,.�,� Dennis rand long term. presentedstated the land adjacent to Mukilteo Blvd.was zoned <br /> single family,the lowest density oni g• <br />` Im <br />