My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/06/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/06/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:16:40 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/18/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n. <br /> 285 <br /> June 18,1990 <br /> Councilman Michelson left the meeting at this time. <br /> Ron Cameron,of the capacity,current Transportation projected.nHe addressed <br /> dhad b issue <br /> en <br /> and computations made on developable land adjacent to the <br /> on low density over the past rel y ee,and found.that these counts compared thos <br /> nearly area <br /> the count was the same 'ago.thTrans- <br /> portation <br /> o le <br /> a pDepartment would not be With the current coning remainingt consider traffic on Mukilteo lthe same. <br /> Gouncilman League inquired about treducedspeea limit <br /> osed on Mukilteo an the number of accidents. <br /> an, .Cameron statedthere had been a reduction <br /> Bennie <br /> Planning Department, <br /> eelborated on the short and <br /> long 'stating t,ashorte alternatives <br /> were mainly <br /> oncourses ofavtin a long term ones mere m <br /> a y by <br /> Council active. <br /> President Overstreet <br /> workshop would be held to deal with the whole <br /> Picture and not just a specific area. <br /> Mr.Cameron stated that Ts <br /> oriented toward the Blvd.byC nciloenadmon <br /> istrati and dation was to mstaff based on <br /> the fa at Mukilteo Blvd.will be improved. 1 <br /> • David E.Hingston, f 1341 Mukilteo Blvd.,recommended t policy be <br /> establishedted that othe <br /> • traffic Mukilteo felt the policy arterial <br /> dei opmentaomote localuseand endeavor to restrict multipleehousing <br /> representing <br /> the developer o Ridge,a proposed <br /> Mfamily development near which <br /> iForest <br /> denied aCCFSS <br /> Mukiltec,Boulevardby kheCadaccess tattsproposal will be <br /> dveetaanfefitst o develop a policy ny <br /> for the Blvd.reconsideration <br /> rd eooisaldaa <br /> Deoelopment Policy <br /> to Council and recommended that apolicy be adopted <br /> written form., <br /> Bill Dobler,of 4 G1enhaven Dr policy would <br /> guideline a decisions o line. 'proposals <br /> ivi e e judged separately. then a <br /> ndingla Gula be b substantiating facts. <br /> Mukilteo Blvd.h characteristics uniqe t the B uch�a <br /> no sidewalks,noroomrpedestrian paths,oP vd mo <br /> others. a favored a y for t parking, <br /> driveways <br /> and a Blvd.oan o density in the area,,but to <br /> consider the safety factor,first and foremost. <br /> Tim regarding developer Forest <br /> Ridge,stated tunfairly <br /> thisp proposed d planned to resubmit itag and <br /> gain <br /> favored a policy for sMukilteo Boulevard. <br /> Paul Pritchard,of 1101 Blvd.would be voted on fighaaretfet Grandview, t ulaih <br /> said he felt the streets feeding i d d b <br /> included in the policy and questioned whether the draft submitted by <br /> Mr.Shbckey might be biased. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.