Laserfiche WebLink
286 <br /> May 13,1981 <br /> Tarroperty in the assessmetl district being more specifically described <br /> Block ng to the Plat thereof <br /> Plat Volume 4 of Plats, 1 records or recorded o Snohomish county, <br /> Washington.City Council's determine from thePublic <br /> etestimo y f the Local p vementDistrict should <br /> epre enting 60%of the cost of the InnLoal Improvement itYss:=EZtrfile'a.//kitten protest within 30 <br /> da`co optihority to on. <br /> of the L./ ordinance,the City is divested-of its <br /> City Council is not obligated to fokm the L.I.D. Protests have been <br /> ftfou st n he n <br /> order to proceed. • <br /> participants's L.1.D.FOrMatiOn public bearing cannot commit the L.I.D. <br /> Hearingthe assessment method or amount. The 2nd L.I.D.should tha <br /> purpose of taking testimony on assessments. Today <br /> whether oranot the L.I.D. <br /> should be formed and for what period of years the <br /> payment pe iod should be. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is basedon current bonding assessmentperiod <br /> be <br /> Mrs.Strong said a petition with 908 of the ot.mer.s signatures was received <br /> e petition,for this proposedb.I.D. The-owner-of two Lots,Mrs.Hogland, d <br /> b in phone call discussion s would notprotest not gthe • <br /> P PeteNewland, <br /> ID <br /> ner <br /> and part <br /> owner <br /> Billof said <br /> strictly to <br /> improve <br /> rt. e peti nshagreed to <br /> rthe he 555 improvement <br /> ordinanceagreed betoul be paid for equally by al,rathe'r than by the method ween <br /> y the <br /> ng staff. He Pre,e9cid <br /> ia petition by all the property owners requestingthiisia <br /> L.I.D.was approved,at the time that the method of assessment,was discussed, <br /> the Council would approve this petition. He said the only person not sign. <br /> iLwasaMrs.Hogland and he felt there would be no problem as far as she wa' <br /> 1sdetermineshe ed that the State law designates the <br /> how benefited, <br /> and'because the property on the east side of•the alley had little or no <br /> accessnl this alleyimproved, <br /> Councilman Gipson asked if the Council could assess the <br /> e d es <br /> by Mr.Newland,and Mr.Cattle,ti.City Attorney,said <br /> pro- <br /> posedto do th• <br /> public hearingi lm <br /> an Michelson,seconded by Councilman La g to close the <br />