Laserfiche WebLink
TOT <br /> May 13,1981 <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> 11 <br /> Notion il Carried <br /> COUNCIL 814-166 j <br /> FINAL BEADING: <br /> AN.ORDINANCE providing for the improvemeof the Alley <br /> Ethe astii <br /> of Smith Avenue from 38th an halt concrete ton.19th S b <br /> l,.storm <br /> drainage sYStem and nncenner <br /> struction and storm matertal and work systemnecessary <br /> i ailfl6 taln1 <br /> and creating a Local <br /> yr a ptheeprovement District Fund therefor) S <br /> operty in said District <br /> under ache assessmentsm payment byrbonds or installmentnotes. <br /> dis declared to be the final <br /> t d Michelson, a this {. <br /> A no all he roll. h nal disposition ) <br /> Psty ClerNo.814-166 k <br /> 0l1 Ca Ayes: Langus,Michelson,Baker, Overstreet <br /> Ordinance - ted. ` <br /> RK PROP E,(CE 815-198) <br /> jj <br /> Chtck Logan,Park Director,said during 9) <br /> h h h 001 District <br /> �1 <br /> e Parks and Recreation Board to consider <br /> an excs Park property with the City of Everett <br /> far hange o h <br /> at <br /> eir expense. The <br /> District Board of Directors took action on <br /> July 10,1978 at their regular meeting to approve the <br /> the hthe oard agreed to rav8se value per the <br /> ale foot. <br /> o^ 5 5,788 base upon exchange and 3square feet of Clark Park property to construct six tennis courts � <br /> The Parks <br /> andt Recreation Board has unanimously approved and Y,.accept the appraised value aha ennds to <br /> ntncY and approve the construction of six tennis courts. Th.co.rew serve the general public of the city of Everett and the school district. <br /> Will f 1; <br /> [eer The general consensus was approval of meetings neighborhood deconceptual <br /> clan as presea td. <br /> h Chartere City <br /> n he a for a nen. tefop School <br /> on <br /> f3 <br /> kes it <br /> He <br /> hat I <br /> 'he co...apprOve this exchange <br /> w the <br /> strict to construct six lighted is errexpense. V <br /> ou Gilman A couldSchool exchange t <br /> thv replied that, <br /> ere in fact a <br /> xchange of ary difference li rthe p y could not <br /> a <br /> uld be made <br /> per- <br /> haps the money received from the School <br /> District <br /> yldanalysis of the two properties obe used pay dfor <br /> Pert of the construction as a donation from <br />