Laserfiche WebLink
k 346 <br />• July 22,1981 <br /> He said two issues of access,one along the water'.edge and the Other to <br /> the water's edge through the project,were discussed. In the findings <br /> of the Staten iitFis <br /> case Board, <br /> a es <br /> established and where designed to prevent interference with the principalHe <br /> said the Board does not say that acess to the <br /> Bpiefeasible,then they <br /> et <br /> provide for it either^He pointed out sxrinthefutu <br /> 31in the Planning Commission's1findings and felt that some 5ent should be stated as towhen <br /> the <br /> is to <br /> councilman Aldcroft asked if es e r y be made.Planng Commission t <br /> e after the decision of the Shoreline Hearings <br /> Boardandthein <br /> hese conditions were nbefore the Council today. <br /> Councilman Langus asked if any person develOPing p to gite <br /> public access to the 6ake and Mr.Cattlereplied yes,this was according <br />• to the law. The Counc61 <br /> have to make an analysis <br /> and determine <br /> r <br />• project that is proposed. Sing,family wouldnunder the <br /> these e lake were <br /> they would Bo oe the Council. x <br /> • the City had heard t 3 de he decision that <br /> public access <br /> was <br /> needed <br /> aappealedt thee <br /> and they ddisaggreedw hthe said public a had <br /> to he <br /> dthe lake, they did not clearly state that acess <br /> had to be made to the lake. <br /> Councilman Langus thought <br /> swimming,f ing <br /> public access to alakewhere there could be children dren swi ng,etc. <br />• <br />• <br /> aPelicant h nsrd decision,which calls fordr ssa, <br /> set Hearings <br /> sthepcab volume ois instead <br />••d deleting the cabana. 1Identifying the source, <br /> now <br /> future on for along the water's edge of SilverpLake.13 t h theaddressing nningin the <br /> Commission's recommendation_eline ngs xdinconditions <br /> eh12un i sholace on <br /> the project when t p it was or g lly issued i December of 1919.4 <br /> The Planning Department is condition#1l t <br /> ropportionateef addition crkssewer a es <br /> • in the south end,the amount to be determined by Public <br /> cne <br /> %crmenling the addition fpinadvertently <br /> Theyedeia ginal it <br /> mandatedconditions,and yet is nexisting ordinance. <br /> .1B,requiring partiCipation in he <br /> path, determined by ordinance ais <br />• effect at time of building permit issuance. <br /> He pointed out that residential uses not dependent on waterfront en <br /> provided bis„ recommends be <br /> obtainedbut not to be activated until such time as easements are obtained <br /> from the balance <br /> Lake prop y and also <br /> uppsthe south side of the property <br /> to silver ba e properties. <br /> • <br />