Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> July 22,1981 341 <br /> Janet <br /> eA . Quby:Attorney r ithe Silver <br /> want <br /> gleamiles tobereguiiredop provide <br /> d <br /> et enahesingle <br /> waterlines hPlanning <br /> Commission <br /> recoMmend <br /> elt <br /> the'C <br /> cil <br /> eal <br /> thin <br /> not <br /> be <br /> perhaps <br /> ust some <br /> gns <br /> that <br /> boats were welcome to <br /> oS0a ffuld havt.t ain. xhisl' ntonthefront .theirilhave toimproved; could a t gatngullrest,etc.without having he fedi oftrespassing o private Counelman Overseetguoted Mosraember of euca,ratecndatnaeesmt "Provision f er aw a path of not lashan10`inwidth upland of the high�ater mark <br /> n (winterthe w 9wouldLake.pr .thenorth aatproject. <br /> hswould <br /> bea editsuthtime <br /> yp ddiionaeaneentsarelinkingthis site with Lake City lrrirconstruction <br /> mhncilhflhQubyrepswudsssacoto council public <br /> this a-good solution. <br /> connect Silver. <br /> line <br /> secured <br /> ity of <br /> ett would <br /> be <br /> Chu <br /> nhilmae Langu askedother R- pbrnlake Gregoire <br /> aidthe <br /> only <br /> `are the mobile home park to the northof thisproposed project. <br /> Councilman Ale/craft then ked if the Councilapproved the lakefront <br /> nd access-to the Silver LakeRoad,x u d he Ci tbez <br /> avffo eeasemenaublic used the access s injured. o exampl i£ <br /> the dock,could the c and <br /> era s trepliedritfwllbl • <br /> impossible decide or City <br /> this tip <br /> as the situation would <br /> have to be analyzed,buttherere certain laws time, <br /> m would not be responsible for situations tsuch as this.provided the y <br /> Mary Hale,a <br /> ected to <br /> member of the owthMa <br /> Management Committee,n#13. e felt thisignored hein of the Shoreline Manage- <br /> s1shoreline <br /> Mang Mastershe <br /> put the felt <br /> il access too far in <br /> the <br /> she itded the theGrowth Management Report addressing opubl <br /> `m Laihack,of Lake p obeebjected to the 10(easement <br /> onsinga family h tliving ihas residence <br /> dwellers because ofthe many-years <br /> Privilege and he would object access on hisis property. <br /> Ray <br /> i1 Peterson, <br /> representing <br /> the <br /> developer, <br /> easPr <br /> been ^ properytheY wlhave <br /> implygob <br /> Management Act. He Building <br /> s_otgbuilding <br /> permit, constructed the <br /> le f eewetercndmptnt had to gthugh he Shorelineat <br /> years had <br /> d <br /> ay <br /> the <br /> the <br /> eathatopubli necessary. Thistoermmntodah _ Stateoxa9decision. tmajority of residents been very quiet the-development,except LaCommunity <br /> At the recent eaMingenissionhearing,the z residents atended,but ehs because they dida nconit property. air the had all the codttohsseforhbthe <br /> and the rg Commission at he first hearing in 1979 <br /> not <br /> t want ken from on• <br />