Laserfiche WebLink
34B <br /> July-22,1931 <br /> 's decision in the courts. <br /> Y NeR az.aPPealingproperty, i d <br /> They u1 9 front and up <br /> the side as nde have f y 1 <br /> f 9 were-necessar <br /> oy-have to give <br />/ • a en the south side of the es possibly b il- <br /> able. might <br /> edestrian <br /> path tF -the sprop hetet d be le f <br /> asked if a 3pedestrian a were requested c <br /> President Baker <br /> the north <br /> side would he object a he de answer. Hefelt <br /> would make a second entrance to the City Park. <br /> Stevenson,Gordon supeinNndent,felt c� fee would be <br /> betteer. would, aproblem,but that it probably <br /> would be a better solution Nantemarae. xcommented <br /> other <br /> projects n d in the <br /> was public accessand the many <br /> problems it <br /> caused. <br /> Councilman ked what Mr. <br /> of the Overstreet Peterson replied <br /> eS,ea Peterson ven sibly sm <br />• wny em�emesa maright-of-way e the norm. all tars. This is <br /> Councilman Overstreet enP be <br /> ive <br /> the 1'frontes and.asked if he was <br /> willing athis <br /> because he felt using replied no. <br /> Counciman Overstreet <br /> ss was to the waterfront the he <br /> • publiclcould not <br /> use this easement <br /> Shirley vanderway,of 301 90th SC til twoof pdrtpertY <br /> rezonedwere to R-4 a fewyears until <br /> a he <br /> y. lake wassinglefamily residences. <br /> efe City <br /> eew anyrmo t <br /> sale the <br /> Silver <br /> L ke 1 both n City and out e'integ ityY <br /> of there Shoreline Management ActiandethecShoreline Management 1...ANN <br /> of the City. <br /> • imSe sidesaid some of the property owners on the east <br /> of 11415 Silver lake B representing <br /> the the lake had y Council, <br /> Council, <br /> contacted <br /> NOW be willing to dedicate an easement to <br /> he <br /> 31 thing She a t the hey would make one statement at one meeting y t the developer had not been fair b e 63 ctives <br /> Y f public <br /> t <br /> some <br /> licies of <br /> he Shoreline Management Act. She said without <br /> access <br /> thouhtthisss easel d,� granerfront ted euaFe useless. She <br /> activated.whennthese <br /> e nuthebP north ot eproposal should be <br /> felt with are <br /> dens to project,even more recreation <br /> Provided. <br /> Mr. <br /> PetenPeterson <br /> suggested striking words i n$13 <br /> of <br /> the C® sion• recommendations dint instead <br /> ion <br /> to connect <br /> either with hecity Parko the north with <br /> publia ss <br /> to the <br /> OverstreetCouncilman pointed o h Board's findings of fact, <br /> conclusions of law vforpublic <br /> walkway hwatisedgeb <br /> provisionsome should be made for access to the public watery <br /> o <br /> fulfil the mandates of <br /> the SMP and SMA". <br />