Laserfiche WebLink
September 9.1961 <br /> The meeting then recessed until v.00 p.m, <br /> ghe regular meeting of the Everett City Council reconvened at 7,00 p.m. <br /> in the Council <br /> p era g and all Councilmenhin attendance.e Everett City all,with President esker <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS-SHADOW RUN-(CB 819-389, <br /> president <br /> ea <br /> of <br /> ow Run and that tonight <br /> would consider the <br /> conclusio presented y he y Attorney y and Planning staff. ga and <br /> Hr.. <br /> tt Attorney,twas <br /> prepared bthCattle, <br /> a elat certain issues <br /> not addressed im 4thand t <br /> hincludedPlanning <br /> ations had been incorporoted. He pointed out <br /> severs Yp graphicalaerrors an wording g ch Proposed draft. <br /> Presidenthave an Baker saidity t attorneys- r both proponent <br /> e Council on this document and <br /> st <br /> changes <br /> attorneys comments if theynwished to.could make amendments <br /> based on <br /> Councilman <br /> regarding Gipsoneeling request <br /> she sOC group <br /> p Y ghtrbefapp priate.on this project rad Cattle Bested written <br /> Bill Ingram, ney for <br /> nal lyes proponents, a bied for in brief background <br /> thereon asthirdrproposal pthatc nsidereder of 1979. ,,which <br /> is thatofdevelopment o P O basis.cHe spoke of ould • <br /> woulde needed dntheeySdid n imum of • <br /> he agreement that <br /> 388 dwelling <br /> it preliminary its and wuld still <br /> approvaleliminary plat approval o on the entire <br /> for this type o e s r plans h awn <br /> was not acceptable <br /> because ta this <br /> aw economically <br /> ravines would have to be filled in to accomplish� athis,feasible and that <br /> Mr.Ingram said he felt there was lack ot <br /> between Council and <br /> Planning staff in regard to recreation,open <br /> ce and <br /> issue. <br /> mentaanetkneenothingousiniHe felt this document contained some aEout and <br /> pointed out this was not as zoning <br /> he He nector as <br /> • <br /> • <br /> fnregarding wthe report. he felt there <br /> were many items of discrepancy in this the Planning Commission. He a/so report <br /> developed b <br /> ell this parcel was included n <br /> t <br /> heb.x.p. or monetary reasonsonly. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> /n conclusion,Mr.Ingram asked that preliminary plat approval be granted. <br /> Jim <br /> iSsue ditsr <br /> dfrelat gsaider,attorney for the opponents,reviewed the no <br /> Provisions had abeenmad areas bet <br /> ded was single <br /> family homes. pointed o what h clients most <br />